05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

out of order with respect to declination; the<br />

cluster should be listed between NGC 7814<br />

(<strong>Caldwell</strong> 43) and NGC 7479 (<strong>Caldwell</strong> 44).<br />

<strong>Caldwell</strong> 49. <strong>The</strong> designation of the Rosette<br />

Nebula as NGC 2237-9 is incorrect; the Rosette<br />

comprises NGC 2237, NGC 2238, and NGC 2246.<br />

<strong>Caldwell</strong> 89. <strong>The</strong> S Normae Cluster is not NGC<br />

6067, as originally published in Sky & Telescope,<br />

but NGC 6087.<br />

<strong>Caldwell</strong> 100. This entry was originally labeled<br />

"IС 2944" and "Gamma Centauri Cluster." But<br />

this identification is quite garbled. First, there is<br />

no Gamma Centauri Cluster; the name should<br />

have read "Lambda Centauri Cluster." But that<br />

alone doesn't fix the problem, for in the Index<br />

Catalogues IС 2944 is a nebula, not a star cluster.<br />

(Steven Lee and David Ratledge came close to<br />

solving the puzzle of <strong>Caldwell</strong> 100's designation<br />

in the June 2000 issue of Sky & Telescope, page 12,<br />

but even their informative discussion didn't close<br />

the case on <strong>Caldwell</strong> 100. See Chapter 2.)<br />

That's just the tip of the research iceberg.<br />

Once I started accumulating historical and<br />

observational information on other <strong>Caldwell</strong><br />

objects, more problems materialized; their solutions<br />

are detailed in the appropriate sections of<br />

the next chapter.<br />

One more concern. Throughout the book I<br />

will refer to several star atiases: Wil Tirion's Sky<br />

Atlas2000.0 (both the first and second editions),<br />

Uranometria 2000.0, the Millennium Star Atlas, and<br />

more. Why? Just as there are inconsistencies<br />

within the historical record and the amateur literature,<br />

so too are there problems with these star<br />

charts (omissions, misplottings, etc.). Since I have<br />

no idea which star charts you own, I often<br />

14<br />

take the time to tell you which objects appear on<br />

which atlases, and what was omitted or misplotted.<br />

You shouldn't have any problems with<br />

the star charts in this book, of course, and they<br />

alone should enable you to locate all 109<br />

<strong>Caldwell</strong> objects without having to resort to other<br />

atlases.<br />

THE FINDER CHARTS<br />

As noted above, finding a <strong>Caldwell</strong> object that<br />

you've never seen before is a three-step process.<br />

First look up its celestial coordinates (its right<br />

ascension and declination) alongside the object's<br />

description in Chapter 2, or in Appendix A. Next,<br />

use those coordinates to find the object on the allsky<br />

star charts located on the endpapers. <strong>The</strong> allsky<br />

charts depict the constellations much as a<br />

planisphere would, and they should tell you at a<br />

glance the general direction in which to look<br />

(assuming your chosen object is above the<br />

horizon). Finally, return to Chapter 2 and look at<br />

the object's detailed finder chart. That chart will<br />

have at least one Bayer (Greek-lettered) or<br />

Flamsteed (numbered) star in common with the<br />

all-sky chart. Beginning with that star, which<br />

should be visible to the naked eye from all but<br />

the most light-polluted sites, you can star-hop to<br />

the <strong>Caldwell</strong> object, either by following the route<br />

described in Chapter 2 or by blazing your own<br />

trail.<br />

<strong>The</strong> detailed charts in Chapter 2 are outwardly<br />

similar to Wil Tirion and Roger W .<br />

Sinnott's Sky Atlas 2000.0, second edition. Like the<br />

Field and Desk editions of that work, they have a<br />

scale of 3.55° (3° 33') per inch (or 7.1 mm per<br />

degree), and they depict stars as faint as<br />

magnitude 8.5, providing a generous density of<br />

stellar "stepping-stones" for a wide-field<br />

telescope. North is up and west is to the right<br />

throughout (though for objects that lie near one<br />

of the celestial poles there is some distor-<br />

Deep-Sky Companions: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!