05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

each square arcminute of its disk shines with the<br />

light of a magnitude-13.2 star. Some patience is<br />

required to find NGC 7006 because the cluster<br />

resides in a region devoid of bright naked-eye<br />

landmarks. <strong>The</strong> closest such landmark is<br />

magnitude-4.5 Gamma (γ) Delphini, the nose of<br />

the celestial Dolphin, 3.5° due west<br />

of the cluster. Owners of equatorially mounted<br />

telescopes will have no problem finding the<br />

cluster, since they just have to sweep their<br />

telescopes eastward with a low-power eyepiece.<br />

(In a more relaxed vein, Walter Scott Houston<br />

suggested setting the telescope on Gamma<br />

Delphini and waiting 15 minutes for the globular<br />

to drift into view.) Those using altazimuth<br />

mounts should refer to the finder chart here.<br />

Note that NGC 7006 is part of an upside-down<br />

and tilted Τ of 6th- to 7th-magni-tude stars. First<br />

use binoculars to locate this asterism; then, using<br />

the widest field your tele-<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong><br />

42<br />

scope provides, sweep from Gamma Delphini to<br />

the T. If you have a Telrad finder, place the right<br />

edge of the widest illuminated ring on Gamma<br />

Delphini; the left edge of the outer ring will slice<br />

through the T. Don't expect to see the cluster in<br />

binoculars. I tried, with hand-held 7x50s and<br />

10x50s, but failed. Houston tried with 16x40s<br />

mounted on a tripod, and, though he knew<br />

exactly where to look, he could not see the<br />

cluster through them.<br />

Although NGC 7006 has been seen in telescopes<br />

as small as a 3-inch, doing so is a challenge.<br />

At 23x in the 4-inch Genesis under dark<br />

skies, the cluster appeared as a faint glow whose<br />

body had only a little more substance than that of<br />

NGC 2419. To pull NGC 7006's glow out from the<br />

background, Scotty suggested using more than<br />

50x; with his 4-inch refractor 100x seemed best to<br />

him. In the Genesis at 72x the cluster shows a<br />

definite roundness, with hints of a core and a<br />

breathlike extension or outer halo. In time the<br />

core becomes obvious, as does the outer<br />

envelope, which causes the cluster to swell<br />

slightly with averted vision, just like a "blinking<br />

planetary." At 130x there is no hint of resolution.<br />

<strong>The</strong> cluster keeps its form but takes on a pasty<br />

glow <strong>The</strong> core begins to show stubby crosslike<br />

arms or appendages. NGC 7006's amorphous<br />

nature should not surprise us. After all, the<br />

globular is one of the most difficult to resolve,<br />

and its brightest star shines at a feeble magnitude<br />

15.6. Christian Luginbuhl and Brian Skiff were<br />

unable to resolve the cluster with a 10-inch<br />

telescope even in good seeing, though they did<br />

resolve a few faint stars over a granular<br />

background with a 12-inch at 475x. Using a 13.1inch<br />

f/4.5 reflector, Barbara Wilson found the<br />

cluster to be a very dense fuzzball with no<br />

perceptible individual stars. Photographs taken<br />

through large telescopes reveal the cluster to be a<br />

tight snowball of starlight with an almost<br />

hexagonal core. A promi-<br />

171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!