05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

68<br />

68<br />

R Coronae Australis<br />

Nebula<br />

NGC 6729<br />

Type: Emission and<br />

Reflection Nebula<br />

Con: Corona<br />

Australis<br />

RA: 19 h 01 m 54 s<br />

Dec:-36° 57. 1’<br />

Mag: -9.5 (O'Meara);<br />

variable<br />

Diam: 1.3'; variable<br />

Dist: 424 light-years<br />

Disc: Albert Marth, listed in his<br />

Catalogue of 600 new<br />

nebulae, published in 1876 in the Memoirs of the Royal<br />

Astronomical Society, Vol. XXXVI<br />

H ERSCHEL: None.<br />

OUT OF CURIOSITY ONE NIGHT IN SEPTEMBER<br />

1996,1 put a low-power eyepiece into my Genesis<br />

and swept its 4-inch glass across the northeastern<br />

corner of Corona Australis, the Southern Crown,<br />

just below the Teapot aster-ism in Sagittarius. I<br />

was pretending to be Charles Messier hunting for<br />

comets. I wanted to see if Messier would have<br />

picked up the R Coronae Australis Nebula<br />

(<strong>Caldwell</strong> 68). Of course, Messier's instrument<br />

would not have been as good as mine, so I took<br />

that into account. I also chose to ignore the fact<br />

that this region was simply too far south for him<br />

to observe. But had he observed from a more<br />

favorable latitude, I wondered, what would he<br />

have found here? Remember, Messier was not<br />

looking for faint nebulae; he was looking for<br />

comets. Without question, the father of comet<br />

hunters would have noticed the 7th-magni-<br />

270<br />

GC: None.<br />

NGC: Variable star (11th magnitude and fainter) with nebula.<br />

tude globular cluster NGC 6723 in Sagittarius; it<br />

lies only 30' northwest of our target. (Surprisingly,<br />

this stunning object failed to make it<br />

into the <strong>Caldwell</strong> Catalog.) It's possible that the<br />

great comet hunter would have noticed the close<br />

7th-magnitude double star at the core of the<br />

nebula IC 4812, a little more than 10' southwest of<br />

R Coronae Australis; the pair's tightness makes it<br />

look fuzzy, like M40 in Ursa Major, so its<br />

character probably would have piqued Messier's<br />

curiosity. And it's also possible, though unlikely,<br />

that Messier would have noticed the faint double<br />

nebula NGC 6726-7 just 5' northwest of our<br />

target. But I'm certain Messier would have<br />

missed our <strong>Caldwell</strong> object—a "little" star with a<br />

"tail" — because it simply would have been too<br />

inconspicuous for this man with a mission.<br />

Not that the nebula isn't visible in a small<br />

Deep-Sky Companions: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!