05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ought it to our attention in the February 1985<br />

issue of the Journal for the History of Astronomy.<br />

Hodierna, an astronomer at the court of the Duke<br />

of Montechiaro, used a simple 20x Galilean<br />

refractor for his observations. Most interesting,<br />

Hodeirna also predated Herschel with a<br />

"plurality of worlds" concept, for he believed that<br />

all nebulous objects were clusters of stars that<br />

astronomers had resolved to various degrees.<br />

(Actually, this belief has roots that stretch back to<br />

Galileo, who had resolved the Milky Way, and<br />

"nebulous patches" within the Milky Way, into a<br />

number of stars.)<br />

Both William and John Herschel singled out<br />

NGC 2362, calling it a "beautiful cluster"<br />

and a "fine cluster," respectively. In his 1844<br />

Cycle of Celestial <strong>Objects</strong>, Adm. William Henry<br />

Smyth describes it under the heading of 30<br />

Canis Majoris, writing "a star with a compan-<br />

ion [29 Canis Majoris] in cluster . . . on the<br />

Greater Dog's back <strong>The</strong> whole has a beau-<br />

tiful appearance, the bright white star [30<br />

Canis Majoris] being surrounded by a rich<br />

gathering of minute companions, in a slightly<br />

elongated form, and nearly vertical position."<br />

Several sources list NGC 2362 as a star cluster<br />

and a nebula. Sky Catalogue 2000.0 lists NGC 2362<br />

in its section on open clusters<br />

64<br />

and again in its section on bright nebulae. But<br />

look at the NGC description in the table above.<br />

Note that there is no mention of nebulosity. Sky<br />

Catalogue2000.0 also includes aTrumpler code for<br />

the open cluster and that code includes the letter<br />

η for nebula. This, too, is a mystery, because in<br />

his original 1930 work (Lick Observatory Bulletin<br />

Vol. 14, No. 420) Robert J. Trumpler did not use<br />

an n. In other words, Trumpler did not see any<br />

nebulosity in NGC 2362. In fact, color-magnitude<br />

diagrams of the cluster reveal litde if any<br />

reddening or absorption.<br />

In 1949 the late Harold Johnson of Washburn<br />

Observatory observed NGC 2362 at the urging of<br />

Walter Baade, who pointed out that "there is no<br />

discernible nebulosity around the cluster."<br />

Johnson's photometric and visual observations,<br />

made with the 100- and 60-inch reflectors on<br />

Mount Wilson, confirmed this fact. "<strong>The</strong>re is little<br />

reason," Johnson wrote, "to suspect the existence<br />

of nebulosity in NGC 2362; an examination of the<br />

original negative [taken with the 100-inch<br />

reflector] likewise shows no nebulosity. <strong>The</strong><br />

visual appearance with the 100-inch telescope is<br />

in agreement with the conclusion that the amount<br />

of nebulosity associated with the cluster is<br />

negligible." More recently, in a 1991 Astronomical<br />

Journal paper, David Wilner (University of<br />

California, Berkeley) and Charles Lada (Harvard-<br />

Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics) referred to<br />

NGC 2362 as "a rich young star cluster devoid of<br />

natal gas and dust." Other researchers have come<br />

to the same conclusion.<br />

Yet there is nebulosity around the Tau Canis<br />

Majoris Cluster. <strong>The</strong> confusion, says Lada, stems<br />

from the fact that a bubble of gas does surround<br />

the cluster, but it is about 5° across — vastly<br />

wider than the cluster. Sharp-less 310, as the<br />

bubble is called, is a very-low-density<br />

filamentary HII region that appears on the redsensitive<br />

National Geographic So-<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong> 255

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!