05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

37<br />

Collinder reversed the two dimensions again in<br />

his catalog; his Collinder 416 (NGC 6882)<br />

measures 20' and his Collinder 417 (NGC 6885)<br />

measures roughly 8'. <strong>The</strong> positions Collinder<br />

gives for the two objects are precisely the same<br />

positions that Trumpler gives for NGC 6882 and<br />

NGC 6885. In other words Collinder's position<br />

for NGC 6885 is the same as Trumpler's position<br />

for NGC 6885, but Collinder's diameter for NGC<br />

6885 equals Trumpler's diameter for NGC 6882.<br />

And Collinder's position for NGC 6882 is the<br />

same as Trumpler's position for NGC 6882 but<br />

Collinder's diameter for NGC 6882 is roughly the<br />

same as Trumpler's diameter for NGC 6885. "My<br />

guess," Archinal says, "is that Collinder simply<br />

copied Trumpler's positions (since they match<br />

exactly) for NGC 6882 and NGC 6885, not<br />

realizing that his identifications were the reverse<br />

of Trumpler's." Wilson, who has also been trying<br />

to solve this puzzle for years, simply tossed her<br />

hands into the air after she searched numerous<br />

catalogs for answers, but found only more<br />

questions. "No one really agrees with each other<br />

on what NGC 6882 or 6885 is!" she says. "Every<br />

reference in [the] amateur literature gives<br />

conflicting information. It is obvious that the two<br />

clusters have been confused with each other since<br />

[the time of William] Herschel."<br />

What a mess! But forget all the confusion.<br />

Let's wipe the slate clean and look at William<br />

Herschel's original discovery notes. (Such a step<br />

is fundamental in solving any identification<br />

problem; one must always refer to the original<br />

sources so far as is possible.) Just where did<br />

William Herschel position NGC 6885 and NGC<br />

6882?<br />

William Herschel made only one observation<br />

of each cluster on different (though subsequent)<br />

nights. First he discovered the object now known<br />

as NGC 6885. On September 9, 1784, he found<br />

NGC 6885 1' east and 27' south<br />

146<br />

of 18 Vulpeculae. Interestingly, Herschel's discovery<br />

position of NGC 6885 is not centered on<br />

20 Vulpeculae but on a point about 6.5' westsouthwest<br />

of that star. In fact, Herschel's<br />

discovery position for NGC 6885 matches the<br />

center of NGC 6882 as plotted on the Millennium<br />

Star Atlas. Furthermore, when I took an unbiased<br />

look through my telescope I saw a faint but<br />

dense patch of stars northwest of 20 Vulpeculae<br />

and a brighter but looser scattering of suns to the<br />

southwest of that star; Herschel's position for<br />

NGC 6885 is roughly midway between these two<br />

concentrations. Now at least one piece of the<br />

puzzle appears to make sense. Without question<br />

there is a cluster of stars (or the semblance of<br />

one) at Herschel's position for NGC 6885, and it<br />

is my recommendation that star charts place a<br />

20'-wide NGC 6885 there. Seen another way,<br />

NGC 6882 in the Millennium Star Atlas should<br />

read NGC 6885.<br />

Now let's look at NGC 6882.<br />

On September 10, 1784, William Herschel<br />

discovered NGC 6882 just 1m 12s east and 12'<br />

south of 18 Vulpeculae. Of it he penned " clus- A<br />

ter of coarsely scattered stars" — which is<br />

uncannily similar to his description of NGC<br />

6885. Indeed, some astronomers have argued<br />

that Herschel's observation of NGC 6882 is simply<br />

a repeat viewing of NGC 6885. Supporting<br />

this allegation is the position of NGC 6882 when<br />

plotted on a star chart. William Herschel positioned<br />

NGC 6882 just south of the star 19<br />

Vulpeculae, where no cluster is evident; this may<br />

explain why many of the early star charts do not<br />

show NGC 6882. Archinal found a small oval<br />

asterism at Herschel's position for NGC 6882 on<br />

the National Geographic Society-Palomar<br />

Observatory Sky Survey and once suggested that<br />

this was the missing NGC 6882. In September<br />

1998, Archinal and I used the 31-inch reflector at<br />

the Warren Rupp Observatory, stopped down to<br />

give us the effective aperture<br />

Deep-Sky Companions: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!