16.06.2013 Views

MY BELOVED IS MINE AND I AM HIS: SELF-KNOWLEDGE IN THE ...

MY BELOVED IS MINE AND I AM HIS: SELF-KNOWLEDGE IN THE ...

MY BELOVED IS MINE AND I AM HIS: SELF-KNOWLEDGE IN THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

symmetry between these two parts and there is much in Bernard’s text to confirm this<br />

reading. Aside from their respective concern for the ascending steps of humility and the<br />

descending steps of pride, the work’s two parts are each marked by a lengthy excursus on<br />

one of the two paradigmatic figures of humility’s ascent and pride’s descent, namely<br />

Christ and Satan. In his work’s second part, Bernard shows how in the proud ascent of<br />

his primordial sin, Satan exalted himself to seize equality with God, but was<br />

consequently humbled by his descent into unending spiritual death and misery.<br />

Conversely, in the work’s first part, Bernard shows how in the humble descent of his<br />

Incarnation, the Word-made-flesh, who did not deem equality with God something to be<br />

grasped, emptied himself to assume human misery that he might bind his fallen human<br />

creatures to himself and lead them by his Ascension to a share in his own divine life and<br />

blessedness. 147<br />

In sketching these two exemplary patterns of ascent and descent, exaltation and<br />

humiliation, Bernard effectively places his reader in the very midst of his book, between<br />

the ways of Christ and Satan, between humility and pride, between his first part and his<br />

second. 148 As in SC 34-38, the reader is confronted with two opposed and inverted ways<br />

of life, the humble way of Christ which leads to divine life and blessedness, and the<br />

147 Though Bernard does not explicitly say so, Paul’s account of Christ’s descent and ascent in the<br />

Christological hymn of Phillipians 2:6-11 serves as the biblical foundation for both Bernard’s teaching in<br />

the Steps and the work’s rhetorical structure.<br />

148 Thus, in response to Basil Pennington’s invitation to find in Bernard’s parallel excurses “some<br />

subtle bit of artistry which we do not readily perceive or appreciate”, Ann Astell proposes that Bernard’s<br />

intention is “to call attention to the contrast between the two descents [of Lucifer and Christ]” and to<br />

propose these two descents as “alternative models for the monks who are about to accomplish an<br />

imaginative descent down the twelve steps of pride.” Pennington, “Introduction,” in The Steps of Humility<br />

and Pride, 14; Ann W. Astell, “‘Hidden Manna’: Bernard of Clairvaux, Getrude of Helfta, and the<br />

Monastic Art of Humility,” chap. 3 in Eating Beauty: The Eucharist and the Spiritual Arts of the Middle<br />

Ages (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2006), 70-71.<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!