16.06.2013 Views

MY BELOVED IS MINE AND I AM HIS: SELF-KNOWLEDGE IN THE ...

MY BELOVED IS MINE AND I AM HIS: SELF-KNOWLEDGE IN THE ...

MY BELOVED IS MINE AND I AM HIS: SELF-KNOWLEDGE IN THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

death to bring about a real, inward, and ontological change in the souls of those united to<br />

his death by faith, charity, and the sacraments.<br />

When Bernard’s letter is read as a whole, it is immediately clear that among all<br />

the various errors he and William have discerned in Abelard’s writings, it is those bearing<br />

on soteriological questions that most concern him. The letter is, essentially, divided into<br />

two parts. In the first, paragraphs 1-10, Bernard denounces what he sees to be Abelard’s<br />

excessive and presumptuous confidence in the power of dialectics to exhaust the<br />

mysteries of the Christian faith and specifically challenges the Parisian master’s<br />

application of dialectics to traditional Trinitarian formulations. Though he acknowledges<br />

that he might in turn discuss numerous other errors in Abelard’s writings, the abbot<br />

devotes the entire second part of his letter, paragraphs 11-25, to what he calls “graver<br />

matters…about which I cannot keep silent.” 395 Specifically, Bernard charges that Abelard<br />

has in his writings attacked the very foundation of Christian faith, the mysterium nostrae<br />

redemptionis or “mystery of our redemption.” 396 In brief, the abbot argues that by<br />

reducing Christ’s death on the Cross to merely an inspiring display of charity, Abelard<br />

has evacuated this mystery of Christ’s Passion of its saving power to deliver souls from<br />

sin and death, and to effect within them that humility and charity by which they will be<br />

conformed to Christ’s own righteousness.<br />

395 Ep 190.10 (VIII, 26): “Haec, inquam, omnia alias que istiusmodi naenias eius non paucas<br />

praetereo; venio ad graviora. Non quod vel ad ipsa cuncta respondeam: magnis enim opus voluminibus<br />

esset; illa loquor quae tacere non possum.”<br />

396 Ep 190.11 (VIII, 26): “Mysterium nostrae redemptionis, sicut in libro quodam Sententiarum<br />

ipsius, et item in quadam eius expositione epistolae ad Romanos legi, temerarius scrutator maiestatis<br />

aggrediens.”<br />

250

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!