MY BELOVED IS MINE AND I AM HIS: SELF-KNOWLEDGE IN THE ...
MY BELOVED IS MINE AND I AM HIS: SELF-KNOWLEDGE IN THE ...
MY BELOVED IS MINE AND I AM HIS: SELF-KNOWLEDGE IN THE ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Church, enabling scholars to instruct the simple in the doctrine of the faith and to refute<br />
the faith’s more subtle opponents. The abbot’s concern is not with the nature of human<br />
knowledge as such, but with the order, manner, and ends of study. Without the<br />
knowledge of oneself and God, the study of all other forms of knowledge, even the study<br />
of theology itself, is, at best, irrelevant to one’s own salvation or, at worst, an inducement<br />
to idle curiosity, vainglory, and pride. 124<br />
For Bernard, it was with reference to this theological knowledge sought apart<br />
from humble self-knowledge that Paul wrote, “Knowledge puffs up, but love builds up”<br />
(1 Cor 8:1). Beyond the knowledge that brings pride, there is another, more fundamental<br />
and truly edifying knowledge, the knowledge that makes one weep over his or her fallen<br />
misery and cry out to God for his liberating mercy. Bernard writes:<br />
You see that there are different kinds of knowledge, since one<br />
puffs us up while the other makes us weep. I would like to know<br />
which of these seems to you more useful or necessary for your<br />
salvation, the knowledge that inflates or the knowledge that<br />
saddens? I have no doubt you will prefer the latter, for pride but<br />
simulates health while sadness seeks it. Those who seek salvation<br />
draw close to it, for those who ask will receive. As Paul tells us,<br />
God heals the brokenhearted and detests the proud, for “he resists<br />
the proud, but gives grace to the humble” (Jm 4:6). 125<br />
124 On this point, see Sommerfeldt, Bernard of Clairvaux On the Life of the Mind, 90-102. Given<br />
that this sermon, and the sermon set SC 34-38, was composed between 1139 and 1145, in the very midst of<br />
Bernard’s campaign against Abelard, it seems very likely that he has the Parisian teacher here in mind. On<br />
the Bernard-Abelard affair, see Sommerfeldt, Bernard of Clairvaux on the Life of the Mind, 120-135.<br />
125 SC 36.2 (II, 5-6): “Vides quia differentia est scientiarum, quando alia inflans, alia contristans<br />
est. Tibi vero velim scire quaenam harum tibi videatur utilior seu necessarior ad salutem: illa ne quae<br />
tumet, an quae dolet? Sed non dubito quin dolentem tumenti praeferas: quia sanitatem, quam tumor<br />
simulat, dolor postulat. Qui autem postulat, propinquat saluti: quoniam QUI PETIT ACCIPIT Denique qui<br />
sanat contritos corde, exsecratur inflatos, dicente Paulo quia DEUS SUPERB<strong>IS</strong> RES<strong>IS</strong>TIT, HUMILIBUS<br />
AUTEM DAT GRATI<strong>AM</strong>.”<br />
78