16.06.2013 Views

MY BELOVED IS MINE AND I AM HIS: SELF-KNOWLEDGE IN THE ...

MY BELOVED IS MINE AND I AM HIS: SELF-KNOWLEDGE IN THE ...

MY BELOVED IS MINE AND I AM HIS: SELF-KNOWLEDGE IN THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of God, they will grow ever more unlike the Word by their pride and self-will, and so<br />

descend further into the region of unlikeness, blindness, and ultimately, eternal death.<br />

In his inclusio, Bernard is chiefly concerned to address an exegetical conundrum<br />

posed by the Bridegroom’s expression, “If you do not know yourself, most beautiful<br />

among women, go forth” (Sg 1:7). This is, the abbot observes, “a harsh and bitter<br />

rebuke,” the sort of words one would expect to hear from an outraged lord dismissing a<br />

disobedient servant, not a Bridegroom addressing his beloved Bride. 81 Why, then, does<br />

the Word now speak to his Beloved not as a gentle and loving Spouse, but with the<br />

terrifying and even threatening words of a Master?<br />

To solve this interpretive puzzle, Bernard adopts a typically inter-textual<br />

approach, referring his readers both to similar passages in the wider Scriptures and to the<br />

immediate narrative context of the Song. 82 He observes that when Moses once aspired to<br />

see God face to face and dared to ask him, “If I have found grace in your sight, show<br />

yourself to me” (Ex 33:13), God did not immediately grant him this favor, but offered<br />

him instead the vision of his back parts that “through this inferior vision, he might later<br />

reach the great vision for which he longed.” 83 Likewise, when James and John dared to<br />

ask Christ for the privilege to sit at his side in glory (Mk 10:35-40), Christ “directed them<br />

81 SC 35.1 (I, 248): “SI TE, inquit, IGNORAS, EGREDERE. Dura et aspera increpatio, quod<br />

dicit: EGREDERE.”<br />

82 As Jean Leclercq showed, Bernard’s exegetical style, which typifies the exegetical style of<br />

twelfth-century monastic theology more broadly speaking, is characterized by a certain “phenomenon of<br />

reminiscence whereby the verbal echoes so excite the memory that a mere allusion will spontaneously<br />

evoke whole quotations and, in turn, a scriptural phrase will suggest quite naturally allusions elsewhere in<br />

the sacred books.” Leclercq, The Love of Learning and the Desire for God: A Study of Monastic Culture,<br />

73.<br />

83 SC 34.1 (II, 9): “Accepit autem pro ea visionem longe inferiorem, ex qua tamen ad ipsam, quam<br />

volebat, posset aliquando pervenire.”<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!