29.06.2013 Views

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

experimentally in this research group and they show a good correlation with the harmonic mean<br />

data(Table 4-3).<br />

Table 4-2. Surface Tension, Polar Contribution, Dispersive Contribution, Polarity, and Rate of<br />

Surface Tension per Temperature for Homopolymers<br />

Polymers γ(mN/m)<br />

at 20°C<br />

γ(mN/m)<br />

at 200°C<br />

γ p /(mN/m)<br />

at 200°C<br />

γ d (mN/m)<br />

at 200°C<br />

Polarity,<br />

X p<br />

(-dγ/dT)<br />

(mN/m-<strong>de</strong>g)<br />

HDPE a 35.7 25.4 0 25.4 0 0.057<br />

PS a 40.7 27.7 4.6 23.1 0.167 0.072<br />

PMMA a 41.1 27.4 7.7 19.7 0.28 0.076<br />

PVDF b 33.2 22.9 8.7 14.2 0.376 0.057<br />

PANI c 55.6 40.3 24.6 15.7 0.612 0.085<br />

a From ref. (Wu, 1982), b From ref. (Baradie & Shoichet, 2003), c Measured by contact angle method<br />

Table 4-3. Theoretical and Experimental Interfacial Tension for Polymer Pairs<br />

Theoretical data(Harmonic mean equation) γ (mN/m) Experimental dataγ (mN/m)<br />

PS/HDPE 4.7 PMMA/HDPE 8.4 PS/HDPE a 5.1<br />

PMMA/PS 1. 1 PANI/HDPE 26.9 PMMA/PS a 2.4<br />

PVDF/HDPE 11.9 PVDF/PMMA 1 PMMA/HDPE b 8.5<br />

PVDF/PS 3.4 PVDF/PANI 7.7<br />

PANI/PMMA 9.3 PANI/PS 15.1<br />

a From ref. (Reignier & Favis, 2000), b Measured by breaking thread method<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!