29.06.2013 Views

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

carried out by comparing minimization of interfacial area and a driving force (gravitational,<br />

centrifugal, shearing force, etc).<br />

Bashforth and Adams(Bashforth & Adams, 1883) related the surface tension to the difference of<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsity between two liquids and the geometrical profile of a drop. The pendant drop method<br />

<strong>de</strong>termines the profile of a drop of one <strong>de</strong>nser liquid suspen<strong>de</strong>d in a less <strong>de</strong>nse liquid at<br />

mechanical equilibrium.<br />

A similar method to pendant drop method is the sessile drop method. In this technique,<br />

interfacial tension is calculated for a liquid surroun<strong>de</strong>d by another liquid with smaller <strong>de</strong>nsity on<br />

a flat surface based on the balance between gravity and surface forces. It implies that from the<br />

shape of the drop at mechanical equilibrium, interfacial tension can be calculated.<br />

The breaking thread technique is a well-known method in which interfacial tension is calculated<br />

based on the evolution of the shape of a thread imbed<strong>de</strong>d in a second phase. Small distortions<br />

with certain wavelengths are generated at the interface of the phases due to Brownian motion.<br />

These small distortions are expan<strong>de</strong>d based on the interfacial tension and the viscosity of the<br />

polymers. Two theories relate the evolution of the thread to interfacial tension: the theory of<br />

Tomotika(Tomotika, 1935b) and the theory of Tjahjadi(Tjahjadi, Ottino, & Stone, 1994).<br />

Different morphologies can be obtained for melt processing of immiscible polymer blends.<br />

Simple morphologies such as matrix/dispersed particles structures, matrix-fiber structures,<br />

lamellar structures and complex morphologies such as co-continuous structures, composite<br />

droplet structures, and multiple percolated structures can be generated(Favis, 2000; Potschke &<br />

Paul, 2003). These kinds of morphologies can easily be transformed by changing effective<br />

parameters such as applied shear, elongation stress, interfacial tension between phases, and<br />

coalescence and breakup of the phases during processing. For instance, the dispersed phase can<br />

be distorted into long fibrils by applying further shear stress. Breakup mechanism can occur due<br />

to lowering interfacial tension between components dispersing fibrils into droplets. Broken<br />

droplets can be coalesced and form fibrils or larger droplets by coalescence mechanisms. All<br />

other mentioned parameters affect the size and shape of droplets, fibrils, or continuous structure<br />

of phases. The combination of these processes can potentially provi<strong>de</strong> us many kinds of phase<br />

morphologies suitable for various applications.<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!