theory. Through the control of the composition of the inner(HDPE) and outer(PVDF) layers in the onion structure, the morphology can be transformed to a highly elongated onion morphology and subsequently to a multi-percolated structure in which all HDPE, PS, PMMA, and PVDF phases are continuous and percolated throughout the system. It is shown that the addition of PANI results in a 5-component multi-encapsulated, multi-percolated blend with the PANI situated in the core of the system. The addition of an interfacial modifier for the PS and PMMA components results in the diminished phase sizes of those particular components which, due to the encapsulated nature of the morphology, has the effect of reducing the phase size for all other phases as well. The conductivity is measured for a wi<strong>de</strong> range of the above systems as a function of the number of phases and as a function of the PANI concentration. It is shown that increasing the number of components in the blend with a multi-percolated structure from ternary to quaternary to quinary and finally to an interfacially modified quinary blend results in a several or<strong>de</strong>rs of magnitu<strong>de</strong> increase in the conductivity of the system. In this way, the percolation threshold of the PANI can be reduced to below 5 vol%. The conductivity of the quinary blend system, for example, can be increased from 10 -15 S cm -1 (pure PE) to 10 -5 S cm -1 at 5 % PANI and up to 10 -3 S cm -1 for 10% PANI. These are the highest conductivity values ever reported for these PANI concentrations in melt processed systems. 4.6 Acknowledgements The authors express appreciation to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for supporting this work. They also thank F. Normandin from the Institut <strong>de</strong>s matériaux industriels for his assistance with the conductivity measurements of the samples. 4.1. References (1) Moussaif, N.; Jérôme, R. Polymer 1999, 40, 3919. (2) Reignier, J.; Favis, B. D. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 6998. (3) Reignier, J.; Favis, B. D. AIChE Journal 2003, 49, 1014. (4) Zhang, J.; Ravati, S.; Virgilio, N.; Favis, B. D. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 8817. (5) Virgilio, N.; Marc-Aurele, C.; Favis, B. D. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 3405. 132
(6) Virgilio, N.; Desjardins, P.; L'Esperance, G.; Favis, B. D. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 7518. (7) Torza, S.; Mason, S. G. J. Coll. Interface Sci. 1970, 33, 67. (8) Hobbs, S. Y.; Dekkers, M. E. J.; Watkins, V. H. Polymer 1988, 29, 1598. (9) Reignier, J.; Favis, B. D. Polymer 2003, 44, 5061. (10) Zilberman, M.; Siegmann, A.; Narkis, M.; 1 ed.; SAMPE: Anaheim, CA, USA, 1998; Vol. 43, p 528. (11) Zilberman, M.; Siegmann, A.; Narkis, M. Journal of Macromolecular Science - Physics 2000, B39, 333. (12) Pud, A.; Ogurtsov, N.; Korzhenko, A.; Shapoval, G. Progress in Polymer Science (Oxford) 2003, 28, 1701. (13) Anand, J.; Palaniappan, S.; Sathyanarayana, D. N. Progress in Polymer Science (Oxford) 1998, 23, 993. (14) Bhattacharya, A.; De, A. Journal of Macromolecular Science - Reviews in Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics 1999, C39, 17. (15) Scher, H.; Zallen, R. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1970, 53, 3759. (16) Gubbels, F.; Blacher, S.; Vanlathem, E.; Jerome, R.; Deltour, R.; Brouers, F.; Teyssie, P. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 1559. (17) Gubbels, F.; Jerome, R.; Teyssie, P.; Vanlathem, E.; Deltour, R.; Cal<strong>de</strong>rone, A.; Parente, V.; Bredas, J. L. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 1972. (18) Jagur-Grodzinski, J. Polymers for Advanced Technologies 2002, 13, 615. (19) Bridge, B.; Tee, H. International Journal of Electronics 1990, 69, 785. (20) Carmona, F. Physica A: Statistical and Theoretical Physics 1989, 157, 461. (21) Munson-McGee, S. H. Physical Review B (Con<strong>de</strong>nsed Matter) 1991, 43, 3331. (22) Sumita, M.; Sakata, K.; Asai, S.; Miyasaka, K.; Nakagawa, H. Polymer Bulletin (Berlin) 1991, 25, 265. (23) Burroughes, J. H.; Jones, C. A.; Friend, R. H. Nature 1988, 335, 137. (24) Paul, R. K.; Vijayanathan, V.; Pillai, C. K. S. Synthetic Metals 1999, 104, 189. (25) Macdiarmid, A. G.; Jin-Chih, C.; Halpern, M.; Wu-Song, H.; Shao-Lin, M.; Somasiri, L. D.; Wanqun, W.; Yaniger, S. I. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Physics and Chemistry of Low-Dimensional Synthetic Metals (ICSM 84), 17-22 June 1984; 1-4 ed. UK, 1985; Vol. 121, p 173. (26) Andreatta, A.; Cao, Y.; Chiang, J. C.; Heeger, A. J.; Smith, P. Synthetic Metals 1988, 26, 383. (27) Ruokolainen, J.; Eerikainen, H.; Torkkeli, M.; Serimaa, R.; Jussila, M.; Ikkala, O. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 9272. (28) Hartikainen, J.; Lahtinen, M.; Torkkeli, M.; Serimaa, R.; Valkonen, J.; Rissanen, K.; Ikkala, O. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 7789. (29) Panipol http://www.azom.com/<strong>de</strong>tails.asp?ArticleID=1197 2000. (30) Segal, E.; Haba, Y.; Narkis, M.; Siegmann, A. Journal of Polymer Science, Part B: Polymer Physics 2001, 39, 611. (31) Shacklette, L. W.; Han, C. C.; Luly, M. H. Synthetic Metals 1993, 57, 3532. (32) Ikkala, O. T.; Laakso, J.; Väkiparta, K.; Virtanen, E.; Ruohonen, H.; Järvinen, H.; Taka, T.; Passiniemi, P.; Österholm, J. E.; Cao, Y.; Andreatta, A.; Smith, P.; Heeger, A. J. Synthetic Metals 1995, 69, 97. 133
- Page 1 and 2:
© Sepehr Ravati, 2010. UNIVERSITÉ
- Page 3 and 4:
DEDICATED To my parents iii
- Page 5 and 6:
RÉSUMÉ Cette thèse présente, po
- Page 7 and 8:
devenir une structure hiérarchique
- Page 9 and 10:
ABSTRACT This thesis presents, for
- Page 11 and 12:
system can be increased from 10 -15
- Page 13 and 14:
CONDENSÉ EN FRANÇAIS Dans ce trav
- Page 15 and 16:
deuxième coquille de PS. Les phase
- Page 17 and 18:
structures à percolation multiple
- Page 19 and 20:
autre sous-type de morphologie dans
- Page 21 and 22:
TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION.......
- Page 23 and 24:
xxiii 2.4.1.1.1 Charged Polymer Ads
- Page 25 and 26:
5.3.4 Annealing Test ..............
- Page 27 and 28:
xxvii REFERENCES ..................
- Page 29 and 30:
LIST OF FIGURES xxix Figure 1-1. a)
- Page 31 and 32:
Figure 2-12. SEM photomicrograph of
- Page 33 and 34:
Figure 2-34. Schematic view of diff
- Page 35 and 36:
Figure 4-8. SEM micrographs of vari
- Page 37 and 38:
Figure 5-6. a),b) Scanning electron
- Page 39 and 40:
and c) triangular concentration dia
- Page 41 and 42:
n number of moles p concentration o
- Page 43 and 44:
AFM atomic force microscopy LIST OF
- Page 45 and 46:
PS-co-PMMA copolymer of PS and PMMA
- Page 47 and 48:
1.1 Introduction CHAPTER 1 - INTROD
- Page 49 and 50:
Figure 1-2. Human heart, longitudin
- Page 51 and 52:
One of the applications for porous
- Page 53 and 54:
On the other hand, a novel tri-cont
- Page 55 and 56:
2.1 Polymer Blends CHAPTER 2 - LITE
- Page 57 and 58:
Based on Sterling’s approximation
- Page 59 and 60:
Antonoff’s rule (Equation 2-13) i
- Page 61 and 62:
2.1.2.1 Binary Polymer Blends 2.1.2
- Page 63 and 64:
Some other studies(Everaert, Aerts,
- Page 65 and 66:
where the parameter z is dependent
- Page 67 and 68:
“compatibilization” was suggest
- Page 69 and 70:
a) λ BC A and B are matrices, b) C
- Page 71 and 72:
Reignier & Favis, 2000, 2003a; Reig
- Page 73 and 74:
measure the interfacial tension of
- Page 75 and 76:
a) b) Figure 2-6. Dependence of the
- Page 77 and 78:
Omonov et al. found double percolat
- Page 79 and 80:
2.1.2.2.3 Effect of Composition on
- Page 81 and 82:
a) b) C B A c) Figure 2-12. SEM pho
- Page 83 and 84:
In the case where PS is the matrix,
- Page 85 and 86:
Posthuma de Boer, 1999) (Kumin & Ch
- Page 87 and 88:
lattice, such as square lattice, wi
- Page 89 and 90:
magnetization, which is a function
- Page 91 and 92:
Polymers have long been thought of
- Page 93 and 94:
epoxy as a function of nanotube wei
- Page 95 and 96:
Figure 2-19. Approaching the percol
- Page 97 and 98:
Figure 2-21. Transmission electron
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 2-22: Dependence of PE conti
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 2-24. Plot of the total numb
- Page 103 and 104:
chain provides the conductive path
- Page 105 and 106:
2.3.1.2.1 Polyaniline One of the mo
- Page 107 and 108:
CoPA/LLDPE/PANI blend and a poor-qu
- Page 109 and 110:
Narkis and co-workers extended and
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 2-31: Conductivity of PVDF/P
- Page 113 and 114:
organic thin films, a novel and str
- Page 115 and 116:
on the topic have been reported in
- Page 117 and 118:
succeeded in creating thin films wi
- Page 119 and 120:
Addition of salt to the solution of
- Page 121 and 122:
different from that of linear homop
- Page 123 and 124:
Figure 2-39. Macromolecule with a)
- Page 125 and 126:
polyanion such as hyaluronan (HA)(P
- Page 127 and 128: 2.4.1.1.7 Effect of Salt on Multila
- Page 129 and 130: 2.4.1.1.8 Overcompensation of the M
- Page 131 and 132: important factors determining the g
- Page 133 and 134: As shown in Figure 2-44, swelling a
- Page 135 and 136: increasing the pH value due to a de
- Page 137 and 138: CHAPTER 3 - ORGANIZATION OF THE ART
- Page 139 and 140: discussed above, HDPE, PS, PMMA, an
- Page 141 and 142: CHAPTER 4 - LOW PERCOLATION THRESHO
- Page 143 and 144: or model which predicts where the p
- Page 145 and 146: concentration threshold for the ons
- Page 147 and 148: chemical and weathering resistance,
- Page 149 and 150: Table 4-1. Material Characteristics
- Page 151 and 152: filled with blend pellets. To facil
- Page 153 and 154: 4.3.6 Conductivity Measurements DC
- Page 155 and 156: experimentally in this research gro
- Page 157 and 158: a) b) c) d) Figure 4-4. Schematic i
- Page 159 and 160: microstructure of the quaternary bl
- Page 161 and 162: a) b) c) d) Figure 4-6. SEM microgr
- Page 163 and 164: a) b) PVDF PS PMMA c) d) e) HDPE PS
- Page 165 and 166: Uniform layers of PS and PMMA situa
- Page 167 and 168: the concentration of HDPE is increa
- Page 169 and 170: a) b) c) e) Figure 4-11. SEM microg
- Page 171 and 172: melt-processable and contains 25 wt
- Page 173 and 174: One question that should be address
- Page 175 and 176: Conductivity(S/cm) Ternary Blend 1,
- Page 177: phase(PMMA), the concentration of P
- Page 181 and 182: ONION MORPHOLOGY HDPE PVDF PS Contr
- Page 183 and 184: work described above has focused on
- Page 185 and 186: thermodynamic explanation to predic
- Page 187 and 188: four-point probe increases continuo
- Page 189 and 190: in the rheology tests were compress
- Page 191 and 192: 5.3.6 Layer-by-Layer Deposition The
- Page 193 and 194: prepare a polymer blend structure w
- Page 195 and 196: a) b) c) Figure 5-3. Scanning elect
- Page 197 and 198: spontaneously self-assembled. After
- Page 199 and 200: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) Figure 5-5.
- Page 201 and 202: Since the ultra-low surface area va
- Page 203 and 204: c) a) b) Figure 5-6. a),b) Scanning
- Page 205 and 206: salt to a PSS polyelectrolyte solut
- Page 207 and 208: A relationship between macropore si
- Page 209 and 210: close together. It is interesting t
- Page 211 and 212: Figure 5-9. Mass increase (%) indic
- Page 213 and 214: In this work the conductance of the
- Page 215 and 216: deposited PANI layers increases unt
- Page 217 and 218: (52) Guo, H. F.; Packirisamy, S.; G
- Page 219 and 220: 6.2 Introduction It is well-known t
- Page 221 and 222: modified version of Harkins theory(
- Page 223 and 224: 6.3 Experimental 6.3.1 Materials Co
- Page 225 and 226: Complex voscosity (Pa.s) 1,0E+04 1,
- Page 227 and 228: 6.3.5.2 Focused Ion Beam (FIB) and
- Page 229 and 230:
a) c) b) d) e) f) PMMA PMMA HDPE HD
- Page 231 and 232:
y Harkins theory, PS will always si
- Page 233 and 234:
a) b) c) d) e) f) PS Figure 6-6. a)
- Page 235 and 236:
a) b) HDPE : black PS : grey PMMA :
- Page 237 and 238:
6.4.6 Continuity, Co-continuity, an
- Page 239 and 240:
c) V III II I VII I IV VI Figure 6-
- Page 241 and 242:
Continuity Scheme (a) Figure 6-10.
- Page 243 and 244:
Addition of a low concentration of
- Page 245 and 246:
Addition of small amounts of HDPE t
- Page 247 and 248:
icontinuous network with the HDPE.
- Page 249 and 250:
Three examples are shown in Figure
- Page 251 and 252:
(9) Mekhilef, N.; Verhoogt, H. Poly
- Page 253 and 254:
structures are formed due to the co
- Page 255 and 256:
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS In t
- Page 257 and 258:
REFERENCES A. K. Gupta, K. R. S. (1
- Page 259 and 260:
Caruso, F. (2003). Hollow Inorganic
- Page 261 and 262:
Domenech, S. C., Bortoluzzi, J. H.,
- Page 263 and 264:
Geuskens, G., Gielens, J. L., Geshe
- Page 265 and 266:
Hou, S., Harrell, C. C., Trofin, L.
- Page 267 and 268:
Krass, H., Papastavrou, G., & Kurth
- Page 269 and 270:
Macdiarmid, A. G., Jin-Chih, C., Ha
- Page 271 and 272:
Niziol, J., & Laska, J. (1999). Con
- Page 273 and 274:
Reghu, M., Yoon, C. O., Yang, C. Y.
- Page 275 and 276:
Shirakawa, H., Louis, E. L., MacDia
- Page 277 and 278:
Utracki, L. A. (1991). On the visco
- Page 279 and 280:
Yasuda, K., Armstrong, R., & Cohen,
- Page 281 and 282:
literature has examined factors inf
- Page 283 and 284:
(Reignier & Favis, 2000, 2003a; Rei
- Page 285 and 286:
Table A-1.2. Interfacial tensions a
- Page 287 and 288:
acquisition of images with a very h
- Page 289 and 290:
Table A-1.3. Continuity of the PMMA
- Page 291 and 292:
(17) Reignier, J.; Favis, B. D., Ma
- Page 293 and 294:
PANI. Theoretically, the extent of
- Page 295 and 296:
Equation A-2.7 0( ) 0 1. 5 σ = σ
- Page 297 and 298:
Cumulative Mass × 10 5 (g) dipping
- Page 299 and 300:
of PANI, and an increase in the con
- Page 301 and 302:
Resistance(ohm) 1.0E+12 1.0E+11 1.0
- Page 303 and 304:
esistance value. Samples containing
- Page 305 and 306:
The results of resistance for PS/PE
- Page 307 and 308:
Caruso, F., & Schuler, C. (2000). E