29.06.2013 Views

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The dispersed phase in a binary polymer blend can take the form of fibers, lamella and A-B-A<br />

droplet-in-droplet type structures(Molau & Keskkula, 1966; Reignier & Favis, 2000). In an A/B<br />

binary blend, the dispersed phase type structure(Figure 6-1b) is converted to a continuous type<br />

structure through an increase in the composition. By increasing the concentration of dispersed<br />

phase A, droplets coalesce resulting in a percolation threshold point being reached. This<br />

percolation threshold is the first connected pathway in the blend(Figure 6-1a). Classic<br />

percolation theory <strong>de</strong>fines the percolation threshold as the onset of long-range connectivity in<br />

random systems and it occurs at a volume fraction of 0.156 for a random mono-disperse<br />

distribution of spheres(Scher & Zallen, 1970). Through a further increase of minor phase<br />

concentration, levels of continuity increase until a fully-interconnected co-continuous<br />

morphology is obtained(Figure 6-1c). Co-continuity is <strong>de</strong>fined as the case where each phase is<br />

fully continuous in the blend system. Since this often occurs over a concentration range for<br />

binary polymer blends, this is also known as the region of dual-phase continuity. Phase inversion<br />

is <strong>de</strong>fined as the concentration point where co-continuity converts into a matrix/dispersed phase<br />

morphology. It has been reported that the interfacial tension and the viscosity ratio can also<br />

influence the position of the region of dual-phase continuity(Jordhamo, et al., 1986; Mekhilef &<br />

Verhoogt, 1996).<br />

Much less work has been carried out on the fundamental morphological states present in ternary<br />

polymer blends comprised of significant quantities of 3 distinct phases. Recently, some papers<br />

have <strong>de</strong>scribed the morphological behavior of ternary systems with complex morphologies such<br />

as A-B-C composite-droplet structures(Reignier & Favis, 2000; Reignier, et al., 2003) and<br />

double-percolated morphology(Zhang, et al., 2007).<br />

Complete wetting and partial wetting are two broad categories of morphological states<br />

possible for ternary polymer blends. In an A/B/C system, complete wetting <strong>de</strong>scribes the case<br />

where the most stable thermodynamic state is when one of the phases, say phase B, will always<br />

position itself to completely separate phases A and C. In that case phases A and B completely<br />

wet each other and phases B and C also completely wet each other. In the case of partial wetting,<br />

the most stable thermodynamic state is when there is three-phase contact. In that case, for<br />

example, droplets of B will situate at the A/C interface such that all three phases are in contact<br />

with each other(Torza & Mason, 1970; Virgilio, Marc-Aurele, et al., 2009). Both complete and<br />

partial wetting can be <strong>de</strong>scribed by spreading theory as <strong>de</strong>fined by Harkins equation. A<br />

174

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!