29.06.2013 Views

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Microstructural information collected by SEM (Figure 5-6c) and AFM (Figure 5-6d) <strong>de</strong>picts a<br />

relatively thick polyelectrolyte multilayer as wi<strong>de</strong> as 5.5μm for 38 layers of PSS and PANI on<br />

the surface of the filled sample (B). Picart et al.(Picart, Lavalle, et al., 2001) also reported a very<br />

thick multilayer film of 1μm for 16 layers. They proposed that this thickness increase can be<br />

attributed to a diffusion of polyelectrolyte inwards and outwards in the multilayer during the LbL<br />

process. They also reported an exponential growth of layer thickness similar to the mechanism of<br />

mass growth in this work.<br />

5.4.5 Mass Deposition Dynamics of PSS/PANI<br />

Although the structural information for the construction of ultra-thin multi-layers is extremely<br />

difficult to obtain, gravimetric measurements can interpret the molecular topology of the films<br />

that play the most important role in the formation of multi-layers. Figure 5-7 shows the<br />

quantification of mass <strong>de</strong>position of each layer as measured by gravimetric techniques for<br />

various substrates in both the absence and presence of salt. It shows an unusual oscillating<br />

behavior of thickness growth. After dipping the substrate in the PSS solution, the <strong>de</strong>position<br />

mass increases, followed by a <strong>de</strong>crease in <strong>de</strong>position mass in a PANI solution due to the partial<br />

removal of a previously adsorbed layer. Some previous works(Dubas & Schlenoff, 2001c;<br />

Schoeler, et al., 2002; Tjipto, Quinn, & Caruso, 2007) have also reported on the oscillating<br />

behavior of PSS polyelectrolytes due to the partial removal of previously adsorbed layers in<br />

subsequent operations. Schoeler et al.(Schoeler, et al., 2002) related the extent of removed<br />

material to the critical charge <strong>de</strong>nsity of the polyelectrolyte. Charge <strong>de</strong>nsity for a polyelectrolyte<br />

is <strong>de</strong>fined as the fraction of monomers in the polymer which are charged. If this fraction is much<br />

smaller than 1, the polyelectrolyte is weakly charged. Normally, weak polyelectrolytes tend to<br />

<strong>de</strong>monstrate an oscillating <strong>de</strong>position. Dubas et al.(Dubas & Schlenoff, 2001c) conclu<strong>de</strong>d that<br />

the drawing out of water molecules unassociated with specific ion pairs due to increasing<br />

external osmotic pressure is the main reason for the <strong>de</strong>crease in thickness at low salt<br />

concentrations. Tjipto et al.(Tjipto, et al., 2007) related the oscillating behavior of a multilayer<br />

formed of poly(4-styrenesulfonic acid-co-maleic acid) and PDADMAC to the heterogeneity and<br />

roughness of the samples. Later in this paper it will be shown that all of these explanations are<br />

likely responsible for the oscillating <strong>de</strong>position observed in this work. The addition of 1 molar<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!