29.06.2013 Views

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reignier & Favis, 2000, 2003a; Reignier, Favis, & Heuzey, 2003; Tchomakov, Favis, Huneault,<br />

Champagne, & Tofan, 2004; Urashita, Kawakatsu, & Doi, 2000).<br />

It has been observed that the rheological properties of the two minor phases can play a role in the<br />

final morphology of ternary polymer blends, most notably through viscosity effects(Gupta, 1993;<br />

Luzinov, Pagnoulle, & Jerome, 2000; Nemirovski, Siegmann, & Narkis, 1995; Tchomakov, et<br />

al., 2004), and elasticity ratio effects(Legros, Carreau, Favis, & Michel, 1997; Vanoene, 1972).<br />

The effect of the viscosity ratio is still controversial amongst the authors. Some authors did not<br />

observe any influence of the viscosity ratio on the type of morphology(Reignier, et al., 2003;<br />

Tchomakov, et al., 2004), while some observed encapsulation of the higher viscosity component<br />

by the component of lower viscosity(Nemirovski, et al., 1995), and others observed a contrary<br />

result(Gupta, 1993).<br />

Van Oene(Vanoene, 1972) showed that un<strong>de</strong>r conditions of dynamic flow, the difference in<br />

elasticity between the phases can contribute to the interfacial tension. A dynamic interfacial<br />

tension, which can be quite different from the static interfacial tension, can have a significant<br />

impact on the final morphology. He <strong>de</strong>veloped an expression for the interfacial tension in flow<br />

and <strong>de</strong>fined a term proportional to the difference between a second normal stress function in this<br />

equation(Equation 26)<br />

2.1.2.2.1 Composite Droplet Morphology<br />

Another interesting morphology observed in multiphase polymer blends is the composite<br />

droplets morphology. In this particular morphology, a dispersed phase (B), in a matrix of (A),<br />

encapsulates a third phase (C).<br />

There are two main causes for sub-inclusion formation: 1) Thermodynamic effect: to minimize<br />

the surface free energy of a blend (Guo, Packirisamy, et al., 1997; Hobbs, et al., 1988) and 2)<br />

Rheological effect: the entrapment of the sub-inclusions in a more viscous phase near the phase<br />

inversion region(Favis & Chalifoux, 1988).<br />

Reignier et al.(Reignier & Favis, 2000, 2003a, 2003b; Reignier, et al., 2003) showed that in a<br />

ternary blend comprised of PMMA, PS, and HDPE, when HDPE is the matrix, the blend exhibits<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!