29.06.2013 Views

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

a) b - École Polytechnique de Montréal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The percolation threshold of PANI in this porous <strong>de</strong>vice is achieved at a maximum of 8 layers.<br />

This corresponds to 0.19 wt.% PANI for sample A and 0.28 wt.% for sample B. The<br />

conductivity saturation plateau is achieved at 32 layers which corresponds to 0.76% PANI for<br />

sample A and 1.1% for sample B. This <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce of conductivity on <strong>de</strong>posited layers confirms<br />

the hypothesis that <strong>de</strong>posited PSS and PANI form a network type construction as opposed to the<br />

formation of discrete PSS and PANI layers. In fact, this network formation allows for the fine<br />

tuning of conductivity over several or<strong>de</strong>rs of magnitu<strong>de</strong>. Clearly, the <strong>de</strong>position of only a few<br />

layers results in an incomplete network with disconnections in many parts and <strong>de</strong>monstrates a<br />

limited passage of electricity and thus yields a low conductivity value. By increasing the number<br />

of layers to 8 and 16, higher conductivity values are obtained and the conductivity is in the 10 -9 -<br />

10 -8 S cm -1 range. As more PANI chains are ad<strong>de</strong>d they diffuse into the network resulting in a<br />

significant increase in network branches. The addition of further layers results in a plateau value<br />

for conductivity at approximately 10 -6 S cm -1 for sample A and 10 -5 S cm -1 for sample B. Beyond<br />

32 layers, the further addition of PANI has no effect on the conductivity of the <strong>de</strong>vice. The<br />

conductivity of sample C and D after the <strong>de</strong>position of 38 PSS/PANI layers was measured<br />

showing the values of 10 -9 S cm -1 and 3×10 -7 S cm -1 respectively. The difference in the<br />

conductivity values can be <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt on several factors such as pore sizes and pore distribution;<br />

however the most important one is the internal surface area of the substrate.<br />

The addition of salt during the LbL process has little influence on the conductivity of the sample<br />

as shown in Figure 5-10. Braga et al. (Braga, et al., 2008) and Paloheimo et al.(Paloheimo, et al.,<br />

1995) reported that the electrical resistance of PANI/PSS layers with solutions of different<br />

polymer concentrations <strong>de</strong>creases as more layers are adsorbed until a saturation plateau is<br />

reached, between the 26 th and 30 th layer. This closely corresponds with the results observed in<br />

this work. It is very likely that the formation of a diffuse network structure in the current study is<br />

critical in obtaining high conductivity values. Discrete molecular layers ad<strong>de</strong>d in a classic LbL<br />

protocol using strong polyelectrolytes would have likely resulted in a lower percolation threshold<br />

value, but also would not be capable of achieving the high conductivities observed at saturation<br />

as seen in this study.<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!