08.08.2013 Views

PDF (PhD Thesis) - UWE Research Repository - University of the ...

PDF (PhD Thesis) - UWE Research Repository - University of the ...

PDF (PhD Thesis) - UWE Research Repository - University of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

can transform and widen one‘s perspective (Taylor 2006, Jasper 1999,<br />

Platzer et al 2000b, Mezirow 1981) and increase self confidence and<br />

assertion skills (Taylor 2001, Platzer et al 2000b) while appreciating and<br />

being able to live with uncertainty (Bolton 2005, Bleakley 2000a,b, 1999).<br />

Yet, I have suggested that <strong>the</strong> field and habitus <strong>of</strong> nursing in <strong>the</strong> ward<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten acts as a force to disempower nurses. Discovering aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

disempowerment in our co-inquiry involved exploring <strong>the</strong> habitus <strong>of</strong> being<br />

An Approval Slave and <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> nursing that supported a Blame Culture.<br />

We noticed <strong>the</strong> need to ―fit into <strong>the</strong> nursing team‖ was a predominant<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> field and habitus <strong>of</strong> practice and seemed contradictory<br />

to ano<strong>the</strong>r finding that nurses in this inquiry were feeling isolated in<br />

practice. Could both realities co-exist? This chapter presents <strong>the</strong>se<br />

findings and questions: to what extent is it possible to influence an<br />

organisation through reflecting-in-action especially a large organisation<br />

such as <strong>the</strong> NHS?<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shifts in my thinking since beginning this inquiry has been to<br />

appreciate more fully <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system in inhibiting or promoting<br />

<strong>the</strong> actions for change and <strong>the</strong> learning from my own and o<strong>the</strong>r‘s<br />

reflections (Weil 1998). It is ―<strong>the</strong> working with <strong>the</strong> mess‖ (Weil 1999 p.175)<br />

and ―<strong>the</strong> deep cultural barriers to innovation, development and partnership<br />

working‖ (ibid p.176) that systemic inquiry hopes to address and overcome<br />

to provide sustained or second order change. As I have attempted to show<br />

already, many reflections serve as an <strong>of</strong>floading process and so do not<br />

move to identifying changes in practice. I have shown in <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

chapters <strong>the</strong> powerful culture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ward that creates <strong>the</strong> habitus and field<br />

through vicarious spoken and unspoken messages becoming internalised<br />

and embodied by <strong>the</strong> nurse and <strong>the</strong>n played out without awareness with<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs as games. Thus <strong>the</strong> dominant discourses are kept in place and are<br />

not challenged. Given this context how easy is it <strong>the</strong>refore, to achieve<br />

changes in working practices as a consequence <strong>of</strong> reflecting? Driscoll and<br />

Teh (2001) suggest standing out from <strong>the</strong> crowd and being labelled a<br />

troublemaker can be just two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> many burdens associated with being a<br />

180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!