08.08.2013 Views

PDF (PhD Thesis) - UWE Research Repository - University of the ...

PDF (PhD Thesis) - UWE Research Repository - University of the ...

PDF (PhD Thesis) - UWE Research Repository - University of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

creating <strong>the</strong> Trust Reflective Model showed <strong>the</strong>re is a tendency to cut to<br />

<strong>the</strong> chase, crunch your 30 seconds in as Amy called it, so bypassing<br />

deeper and more meaningful learning. I now see this as a clash <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

fields and habitus <strong>of</strong> learning and expectations between <strong>the</strong> university and<br />

practice and <strong>the</strong> philosophy underpinning critical reflexivity. But surely this<br />

is understandable if patients are put at <strong>the</strong> centre <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> caring process;<br />

our focus should be on <strong>the</strong>m? This is ano<strong>the</strong>r contradiction I suggest,<br />

because whilst nurses claimed and probably thought <strong>the</strong>y were patient<br />

centred from my observations <strong>the</strong>y <strong>of</strong>ten were not; a tone <strong>of</strong> voice, a bossy<br />

command, knowing what was best for <strong>the</strong> patient, not telling <strong>the</strong> patient<br />

what <strong>the</strong>y were doing, ignoring <strong>the</strong> buzzer because <strong>the</strong>y were doing<br />

something more important such as paperwork. Shouldn‘t nurses‘ learning<br />

assume second place to doing nursing?<br />

My argument is that through embodying reflexivity it can become<br />

integrated during care- giving, allowing nurses to have more choice about<br />

how <strong>the</strong>y practise, and encouraging a collaborative and relational process<br />

that reduces unnoticed power between <strong>the</strong>mselves and <strong>the</strong>ir patients.<br />

There has been a lot <strong>of</strong> media attention recently focusing on nurses‘ lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> compassion and dignity with <strong>the</strong>ir patients. Reports such as <strong>the</strong> King‘s<br />

Fund (2008) have suggested a move away from rigid target setting to<br />

recognising <strong>the</strong> caring aspects <strong>of</strong> nursing. The historically embodied<br />

dispositions are unlikely to change <strong>the</strong> emphasis in practice around care-<br />

giving unless <strong>the</strong> culture is addressed, which is no easy task. How do<br />

organisations give legitimate cultural capital to patients‘ hygiene and<br />

emotional support needs when <strong>the</strong> wider field <strong>of</strong> society does not and<br />

historically has not valued <strong>the</strong>se functions? A systemic inquiry through all<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> organisation could begin to address <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> legitimacy and<br />

capital given to nursing procedures. This is not a phenomenon just related<br />

to Britain, Salvage (2006) argues that nurses‘ work is trivialised and<br />

undervalued across all continents. Increasing staffing levels and attention<br />

to <strong>the</strong> environment nurses work in may help in some areas, but this is not<br />

269

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!