08.08.2013 Views

PDF (PhD Thesis) - UWE Research Repository - University of the ...

PDF (PhD Thesis) - UWE Research Repository - University of the ...

PDF (PhD Thesis) - UWE Research Repository - University of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

mattered to <strong>the</strong>m and were relevant to <strong>the</strong>ir day to day work, that change<br />

and learning could happen. As Clandinin and Connelly (2000) note:<br />

―experience is <strong>the</strong> stories people live. People live stories and in <strong>the</strong><br />

telling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se stories, reaffirm <strong>the</strong>m, modify <strong>the</strong>m and create new<br />

ones. Stories lived and told educate <strong>the</strong> self and o<strong>the</strong>rs‖ (p.xxvi).<br />

I prefer to use <strong>the</strong> terminology <strong>of</strong> ―stories <strong>of</strong> practice‖ which I took from<br />

Bolton‘s work (2001). Previously, I struggled with <strong>the</strong> language <strong>of</strong> ‗critical<br />

incident analysis‘ (Benner 1984, Brookfield 1995) because I felt it inhibited<br />

students‘ learning from <strong>the</strong> ordinary events in <strong>the</strong>ir practice. ‗Critical‘ in<br />

health care terms implies an emergency and a possibly dramatic event<br />

requiring immediate intervention whereas I found over <strong>the</strong> years most<br />

nurses struggled particularly with practice events that had a managerial,<br />

ethical or emotional aspect (Clarke & Hopkinson 2000, Hopkinson &<br />

Clarke 2002). In contrast <strong>the</strong> term ‗critical‘ in <strong>the</strong> language <strong>of</strong> reflection<br />

refers to a process <strong>of</strong> challenging <strong>the</strong> values, contradictions, distortions<br />

and assumptions embedded in practice which I now see as a process that<br />

challenges <strong>the</strong> dominant discourses that can impinge on practice.<br />

Before beginning this <strong>PhD</strong>, I frequently heard comments from student<br />

nurses that reflection was purely an academic exercise divorced from <strong>the</strong><br />

realities <strong>of</strong> practice. This was <strong>the</strong> anti<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> what Schon (1983) was<br />

arguing. He posited <strong>the</strong> potential for learning from messy, complex clinical<br />

situations and valued practical knowledge arguing for an ―inquiry into <strong>the</strong><br />

epistemology <strong>of</strong> practice‖ (Schon, 1983 p.viii). By this he meant knowledge<br />

which is situated directly in practice and which he earlier described as<br />

―<strong>the</strong>ories in use‖ (Arygris & Schon 1978).<br />

Arygris and Schon (ibid) found that ―<strong>the</strong>ories in use‖ were <strong>of</strong>ten different<br />

from <strong>the</strong> stories <strong>of</strong> practice told by practitioners, which <strong>the</strong>y called<br />

―espoused <strong>the</strong>ories‖. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, we do not always do what we say we<br />

do, and <strong>the</strong>ory does not always prepare us for <strong>the</strong> reality <strong>of</strong> practice. So for<br />

Schon it was important to learn directly from practice itself in <strong>the</strong> mess,<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!