12.08.2013 Views

software to fit optical spectra - Quantum Materials Group

software to fit optical spectra - Quantum Materials Group

software to fit optical spectra - Quantum Materials Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

−1<br />

where ( α ) kl is the inverse Hessian matrix also called the ‘covariance matrix’. Note, that all<br />

−1<br />

2 2 ( 0)<br />

( 0)<br />

the diagonal elements ( α ) kk are positive because χ ( 0)<br />

= χ ( p1 , K,<br />

pM<br />

) is a local minimum<br />

point and Equation 2-14 can always be applied.<br />

The reasonable choice of<br />

defined by the condition:<br />

2 ⎛ M δχ ⎞<br />

P ⎜ , ⎟ = p ,<br />

⎝ 2 2 ⎠<br />

2<br />

2<br />

δχ absolute value is quite an issue. Ideally, δχ should be<br />

Equation 2-15<br />

where M is the number of parameters, p is the desired confidence probability limit (typically,<br />

x<br />

∞<br />

p = 0.<br />

95 ) and ⎜<br />

⎛ −t<br />

a−1<br />

≡ ⎟<br />

⎞<br />

⎜<br />

⎛ −t<br />

a−1<br />

P(<br />

a,<br />

x)<br />

⎟<br />

⎞<br />

⎝∫<br />

e t dt /<br />

0 ⎠ ⎝∫<br />

e t dt is the incomplete gamma-function (the<br />

0 ⎠<br />

derivation can be found in Ref. [3]).<br />

However, the Equation 2-15 can be applied, if (i) the data points are statistically<br />

independent, (ii) all weight coefficients w ν are unities, and (iii) the model is absolutely<br />

adequate <strong>to</strong> the data. However, as was mentioned in the section 2.1.2, the existence of the<br />

systematic error bars invalidates the first two assumptions. One also needs much optimism <strong>to</strong><br />

2<br />

heavily rely on the assumption (iii). In this situation the choice of δχ becomes rather<br />

ambiguous and, therefore, human-dependent.<br />

Fortunately, from Equation 2-14 it follows that<br />

2<br />

δχ scales the confidence limits of all<br />

parameters proportionally. One can therefore reliably compare the error bars of different<br />

parameters, even though their absolute values might be ill-defined.<br />

2.2. Modeling of the dielectric functions<br />

The central assumption in the calculations RefFIT does is that all measurable <strong>optical</strong><br />

quantities (such as reflectivity, penetration depth etc.) can be expressed in terms of the complex<br />

frequency-dependent dielectric function ε ( ω)<br />

= ε1<br />

( ω)<br />

+ iε<br />

2 ( ω)<br />

of the material under study.<br />

Therefore, the most important issue is the modeling of the dielectric function itself.<br />

2.2.1. Physical properties of the dielectric functions<br />

It is well-known from the textbooks (e.g., [2]) that any realistic dielectric function ought<br />

<strong>to</strong> satisfy certain physical conditions.<br />

First of all, ε1 ( ω)<br />

= ε1<br />

( −ω)<br />

and ε 2 ( ω)<br />

= −ε<br />

2 ( −ω)<br />

, therefore it is sufficient <strong>to</strong> model the<br />

ε (ω)<br />

for ω ≥ 0 only.<br />

Secondly, ε 2 ( ω > 0)<br />

≥ 0 , which means that the intensity of light cannot increase in the<br />

direction of propagation.<br />

Guide <strong>to</strong> RefFIT Page 14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!