13.08.2013 Views

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 461<br />

strange influence that th«y exerted over others. Those stories<br />

she dressed up in all the charms <strong>of</strong> eloquence, and would half<br />

persuade her hearers that they -were true. She was the greatgrand-daughter<br />

<strong>of</strong> the first .John, inherited his peculiarities, and<br />

education, extensive reading, and association with the in-<br />

telligent, failed to root out the seeds <strong>of</strong> fanaticism which in<br />

early life had been so deeply implanted in her mind, that they<br />

had become a part <strong>of</strong> her very being.<br />

THOMAS HATCH.<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> the name Hatch came over early. Elder William<br />

<strong>of</strong> Scituate, who came from Sandwich in England in 1635, with<br />

wife Jane and five children, was a noted man in the early history<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Colony. Two <strong>of</strong> the name <strong>of</strong> Thomas came over, and<br />

settled in Massachusetts, and afterwards removed to the Plymouth<br />

Colony. One <strong>of</strong> them was made a freeman <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts<br />

May 14, 1634, the same day that three others were, who<br />

were afterwards among the first settlers <strong>of</strong> Yarmouth. Thomas<br />

whom Mr. Deane calls an elder brother <strong>of</strong> William, settled in<br />

Scituate, and died there about the year 1646, leaving a family.<br />

Mr. Savage calls this man the freeman ; but circumstances incline<br />

me to the opinion that it was the other Thomas who was made free<br />

May 14, 1634.<br />

Thomas Hatch, the ancestor <strong>of</strong> the family in this country,<br />

was one <strong>of</strong> the nine who proposed, Jan. 7, 1638, O. S., "to take<br />

up their freedome at Yarmouth." On the 5th <strong>of</strong> March following<br />

his name is entered on the record with those who proposed to<br />

become freemen at the next court, but there is no mark against it<br />

indicating that he then took the required oath. In 1641 he had<br />

removed to <strong>Barnstable</strong>, and at the court held the first <strong>of</strong> June<br />

that year, he with others <strong>of</strong> that town, was again "propounded to<br />

be admitted a freeman at the next court." His name does not appear<br />

on any list <strong>of</strong> freemen <strong>of</strong> the town <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong>. He had<br />

taken the "oath <strong>of</strong> fidelity" before his removal from Yarmouth,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!