13.08.2013 Views

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

aBNEALOGIOAIi NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 121<br />

nah, Samuel, 23d April, 1673, and Hepsibah 15th Nov. 1674.<br />

Mr. Deane's statement <strong>of</strong> his removal to Swansea is apparently<br />

right ; but there are other records and other conflicting facts.<br />

Thomas Lewis <strong>of</strong> Lynn, son <strong>of</strong> Edmund, whose wife was Hannah<br />

Baker, removed to Swansea about 1670. I have not space to<br />

state all the facts. The evidence in my judgment is conclusive,<br />

that Thomas Lewis <strong>of</strong> Swansea was a son <strong>of</strong> Edmund <strong>of</strong> Lynn.<br />

The subsequent history <strong>of</strong> his family is known—he was not a son<br />

<strong>of</strong> George <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong>.<br />

Thomas Lewis, son <strong>of</strong> George, resided in <strong>Barnstable</strong> till<br />

1 662, and probably till 1668, for he was in June that year quali-<br />

fied as one <strong>of</strong> the surveyors <strong>of</strong> highways. In 1654, the year after<br />

his marriage, he owned the easterly part <strong>of</strong> his father's houselot,<br />

adjoining the lot <strong>of</strong> John Davis. "Quinque Die, April lB56," he<br />

bought for £20 the ancient tavern and twelve acre houselot <strong>of</strong><br />

Thomas Lumbart, Senior, bounded westerly by the lot <strong>of</strong> Mr.<br />

Robert Linnell, northerly by the harbor, and easterly by the lands<br />

<strong>of</strong> Thomas and Joseph Lothrop. This old tavern, the first built<br />

in <strong>Barnstable</strong>,, stood on the houselot now owned by the heiys <strong>of</strong><br />

Ezra Crowell, deceased. He had hot sqld this estate in April,<br />

1661. June 1, 1658, he was admitted a freeman <strong>of</strong> the Colony,<br />

and his name is on the lists <strong>of</strong> the freemen <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong>, up to<br />

Jifne 4, 1686, when Si^ckenesset was incorporated as a town.<br />

He was not one <strong>of</strong> th^ original, proprietors <strong>of</strong> Suckenesset,<br />

and was not admitted, an inhabitant residefit ,ifi that plantation<br />

till 1668.* He was clerk <strong>of</strong> the proprietors from July ,1685 to<br />

March 26, 1691, and probably for a much longer period. July<br />

23, 1677, he had lapds alloted to him at Little Neck, near<br />

"Wood's Hole. On that lot he had a dwellingTJiQuse, which he<br />

_9old with the land Fe]b,. 25, 1689-10, to Jpnathan H^oh, Senipr,<br />

<strong>of</strong> "Sacknesset," tor^^ten- shillings in silver money." ,The dee^ Js<br />

in the handwriting <strong>of</strong> '^Thomas Lewes, Senior," witnessed by<br />

"Samuel Ganson and Matthew Price," and was ackppwledged<br />

before Col. John Thacher <strong>of</strong> Yarmouth, justice <strong>of</strong> the peace. Pep.<br />

17, 1703, nearly fourteen years after it was dated. The lot is described<br />

as No. 4 <strong>of</strong> the Little Neck lots, and as extending "across<br />

the Neck to. the Great Horbpur, so called."<br />

The handwriting indicates that he was a ready penman, and it<br />

ean be easilv read by persons familiar with manuscripts <strong>of</strong> that date.<br />

Few errors occur in the spelling, and the conditions <strong>of</strong> the grant are<br />

clearly stated. The small sum named as purchase money, perhaps<br />

*Since writine this I find some evidence that he was <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong> in the early part <strong>of</strong><br />

the -fear 1668, consequently removed that year. All the original proprietors at Suckenesset<br />

were not residents. At least one-half <strong>of</strong> the original grantees were non-resident pronrietors<br />

Before Suckenesset was incorporated, June 4, 1686, strictly speaking, all the inhabitants<br />

were townsmen <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong>, and by admitting an inhabitant at Suckenesset,<br />

steictly speaking, was only an admission that the party had become a proprietor by pur-<br />

^chase or otherwise.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!