20.08.2013 Views

Download - University of Hertfordshire Research Archive

Download - University of Hertfordshire Research Archive

Download - University of Hertfordshire Research Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5. Final Study Analysis, Findings and Discussion Adoption, Diffusion and Use <strong>of</strong> E-government<br />

Hassan Al-Zaabi Services in Abu Dhabi Police Force<br />

In this section work practice also had an influence on perceived usefulness. This was similar to the<br />

previous discussion, that because e-services are not being used at the first place and there is lack <strong>of</strong><br />

practice, staff members are not aware <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> the e-services. This made them conclude<br />

that e-services are not useful. The majority <strong>of</strong> male participants, with different level <strong>of</strong> education and<br />

level in the organisation, and who were not using the e-services argued that using e-services will not<br />

increase their ability or performance at work. One <strong>of</strong> the participants who was categorised as a low<br />

level individual gave an example when discussed how the e-services are not useful for his job, “…what<br />

can I do with a computer or this e-service while I am in my police car? It will be waste <strong>of</strong> money…”<br />

(Male, 31-40, high school, low level, 6 months internet experience).<br />

(ii) Similarity <strong>of</strong> outcomes: some <strong>of</strong> the male participants with low level <strong>of</strong> education argued that the<br />

outcomes <strong>of</strong> enquires or transactions online are similar to the outcomes <strong>of</strong> paper transactions. The<br />

researcher tried to give them some examples to show that the process can be different, however, most<br />

showed resistance. “…using e-services or not is the same…” and when asked for the reason, he said<br />

that “…work will be completed doesn‟t matter what method you choose” (Male, 51-60, high school,<br />

high level, no internet experience). A similar response was also given earlier in relative advantage<br />

section, where one <strong>of</strong> the male participants who is categorised as a low level individual said that “…the<br />

e-services can‟t do something imaginary. Maybe it process things fast but in my opinion there is<br />

nothing special about it” (Male, 31-40, high school, low level, 6 months <strong>of</strong> internet experience).<br />

(iii) Confidentiality <strong>of</strong> data: Minority <strong>of</strong> participants who used the e-services stated that they are<br />

useful when it comes to protection <strong>of</strong> data. They were mainly female participants, categorised as<br />

middle and low level staff, and have an average <strong>of</strong> five years <strong>of</strong> internet experience. This theme was<br />

discussed earlier in relative advantage section. However, in this construct e-services were viewed<br />

useful because <strong>of</strong> its ability to protect different applications processed in the department that could<br />

contain staff personal details, therefore this would increase privacy standards.<br />

5.2.4.6 Trust <strong>of</strong> E-service and Government<br />

Trust “in online environments is based on beliefs in the trustworthiness <strong>of</strong> a trustee, which is composed<br />

<strong>of</strong> three distinct dimensions: integrity, ability, and benevolence” Gefen et al. (2008: 276). As given<br />

earlier two main questions were asked to examine trust towards e-services and ADPF. The following<br />

themes were identified.<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hertfordshire</strong> 2013 Page 184

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!