20.08.2013 Views

Download - University of Hertfordshire Research Archive

Download - University of Hertfordshire Research Archive

Download - University of Hertfordshire Research Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 6. Evaluation and Discussion Adoption, Diffusion and Use <strong>of</strong> E-government<br />

Hassan Al-Zaabi Services in Abu Dhabi Police Force<br />

use it” (Male participant from the IT department, 41-50 years old, postgraduate degree, high level<br />

individual, has more than 10 years <strong>of</strong> internet experience).<br />

Another participant talked <strong>of</strong> the involvement <strong>of</strong> staff themselves in this process “you also need to try<br />

as an experienced e-service user, to tell other staff with no experience about the e-services and invite<br />

them to use it. Show them how their work will improve and the benefit they will gain from using the e-<br />

service.” (Male participant from the strategic department, 20-30 years old, bachelor degree, middle<br />

level individual, 5-10 years <strong>of</strong> internet experience).<br />

Proposition 2: Compatibility will have a positive influence on the behavioural intention to adopt and<br />

use <strong>of</strong> e-services. However, this influence is moderated by some <strong>of</strong> the demographic factors.<br />

Most staff members using e-services also utilised computers for most <strong>of</strong> their daily tasks; therefore,<br />

they were used to an online service and environment. They also found computers, the internet and e-<br />

services are in line (compatible) with their roles and responsibilities at work. However, some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

low positioned staff did not use e-services because they said their work is not related to computers and<br />

has nothing to do with it. Therefore, introducing more e-services for assisting with new work roles and<br />

responsibilities will encourage staff to use them and should and will lead staff to be more open to the<br />

idea <strong>of</strong> the e-services.<br />

The 12 participants also agreed with the above finding and supported the view that compatibility <strong>of</strong> e-<br />

services and staff work roles has an influence on the use <strong>of</strong> the e-services. Some also gave reasons for<br />

low positioned staff displaying more anxiety and becoming concerned when considering e-services.<br />

For example one <strong>of</strong> the participants said “All staff has responsibilities at work and they are evaluated<br />

by higher individuals. So the work has to be completed or this will affect the yearly evaluation report.<br />

What I want to say is, most low positioned staff will not risk trying to change their work procedures<br />

and use the e-services if they are not used to it. They do not have time to test things. What if the<br />

outcome standard was different than what is expected, or because they are not used to this procedure it<br />

will take them more time so it will be wasting their time. But if e-services are related with their work<br />

and they are used to it, this definitely means they are not losing anything and will use it” (Male<br />

participant from the policing operations department, 20-30 years old, high school degree, low level<br />

individual, 1-2 years <strong>of</strong> internet experience).<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hertfordshire</strong> 2013 Page 205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!