20.10.2013 Views

Eye for an Eye: The Role of Armed Resistance ... - Freedom Archives

Eye for an Eye: The Role of Armed Resistance ... - Freedom Archives

Eye for an Eye: The Role of Armed Resistance ... - Freedom Archives

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cooper stated " We had 30.06. We had <strong>an</strong>ti-M.35 mm, We had all kinds <strong>of</strong> pistols<br />

<strong>an</strong>d different kinds <strong>of</strong> rifles, whatever." We had whatever it takes to do what was<br />

necessary <strong>an</strong>d they knew this." On only one occasion in 1968, when Evers r<strong>an</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

U .S . Senate, was their <strong>an</strong>y actual shooting between members <strong>of</strong> the defense team<br />

<strong>an</strong>d white racists . Coming home one evening during the campaign, nightriders<br />

<strong>an</strong>d Cooper traded shots. Given the const<strong>an</strong>t amount <strong>of</strong> threats <strong>an</strong>d the activity <strong>of</strong><br />

Evers in the state in violent Mississippi . Only one shooting incident speaks to the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> his security.s<br />

While Evers won the loyalty <strong>of</strong> m<strong>an</strong>y Black Mississippi<strong>an</strong>s, his leadership<br />

<strong>an</strong>noyed activists <strong>of</strong> other Movement org<strong>an</strong>izations in Mississippi, particularly the<br />

young milit<strong>an</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> SNCC, <strong>an</strong>d the national hierarchy <strong>of</strong> his own org<strong>an</strong>ization, the<br />

NAACP SNCC activist believed Evers undermined their ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>an</strong>d attempted to<br />

establish his hegemony in the Mississippi Movement. This failure to gain ap-<br />

proval from the national leadership <strong>for</strong> m<strong>an</strong>y <strong>of</strong> his statements or decisions aggra-<br />

vated the national NAACP hierarchy. NAACP national leaders, among other<br />

things, were aggravated by Evers's outspoken positions on the efficacy <strong>of</strong> armed<br />

resist<strong>an</strong>ce . This was one characteristic (<strong>of</strong> m<strong>an</strong>y) that distinguished Medgar from<br />

Charles . Whereas Medgar "played the trickster," willing to be conciliatory,<br />

Charles was the "Bad. Negro," <strong>of</strong>ten openly speaking <strong>of</strong> the necessity <strong>an</strong>d capabil-<br />

ity to meet violence with violence. One example <strong>of</strong> this is a speech made by<br />

Charles Evers in Nashville, Tennessee during a NAACP <strong>Freedom</strong> Fund Dinner in<br />

February <strong>of</strong> 1964. On that occasion Evers stated :

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!