P - Posters Aprile, G. G. - Migliozzi, A. - Catalano, I. - Di Salvatore, M. - Mingo, A - DIARBOPAVE - Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II Lichens are among the most reliable biological indicators to assess direction and intensity <strong>of</strong> environmental changes. Vesuvius volcano was interest during last century by contrasting effects <strong>of</strong> both natural and anthropic disturbance. Volcanic eruption <strong>of</strong> 1943-44 opened a new fresh primary succession on lavic soils, but the impact <strong>of</strong> human activities lead to a heavy degradation <strong>of</strong> natural ecosystems. Since 1995, the volcano area is protected as a national reserve. With the aim <strong>of</strong> tracking the impact <strong>of</strong> such processes on biodiversity and environmental quality, Vesuvius lichen distribution was monitored over space and time. Past records by herbarium collections <strong>of</strong> nineteenth century were censed and reported to present criteria <strong>of</strong> classification. These data were entered in a GIS database and compared with two recent datasets, one preceding (1980) and the other following (last decade) the starting <strong>of</strong> protection regime over this territory. Multivariate techniques <strong>of</strong> analysis were employed to detect the different directions <strong>of</strong> change and to relate them to both natural and anthropic variables. About 270 taxa were recorded, most <strong>of</strong> which bark or rock crustose lichens from acid to sub-neutral substrata. A relative stability <strong>of</strong> poleophoby was observed, though indicators <strong>of</strong> eutrophication tended to increase in recent times. Other indicators, mainly related to aridity, successional stage and phytoclimatic range, are discussed in this work in relation to the changing environmental conditions <strong>of</strong> Vesuvius volcano. P14-017: IMPACT CLIMATE CHANGE ON YIELD AND BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF WHEAT SEEDS Abdumanon, A. - Kasimova, G.F. - Ergashev, A. - Karimov, Kh. H. - Saboiev, I.A. - Abdullaev, S. F. - Jumaev, K. - Rahimov, M. Institute <strong>of</strong> plants physiology and genetics <strong>of</strong> Academy sciences Republic <strong>of</strong> Tajikistan This paper presents the results <strong>of</strong> study effect <strong>of</strong> different climatic years on the parameters <strong>of</strong> the biological and economic productivity <strong>of</strong> plants and biochemical quality grain promising sorts <strong>of</strong> wheat. The analysis shows that January and November 2006 year, February and March 2007 year and February 1 - March 2009 year were periods with high monthly rainfall in the range. The results show that if in the period to September 2007 to August 2008 year annual precipitation was 358.7 mm, this value in the period September 2008-August 2009 year amounted to 905.6 mm, which is 2.53 times higher. During all these periods the monthly precipitation totals exceeded the norm from 1,3 to 1,73 times. Concerning sorts Kauz and Sham grown under normal climatic conditions, it may be noted that while the seed weight <strong>of</strong> wheat grown in 2008 year, slightly higher compared to the year 2009 year, but the protein content is lowered. The number <strong>of</strong> grains per ear and less in 2009, however, the number <strong>of</strong> seeds from year to year differences is minor. However, the mass <strong>of</strong> 1000 grains in 2009 for these plants was more favorable than in 2008 year. Comparative evaluation <strong>of</strong> biochemical parameters for sort Sham showed that the protein content almost does not change depending on climatic conditions in 2008 and 2009 year, despite significant differences in the sizes <strong>of</strong> seeds. The report discusses the impact <strong>of</strong> different climatic years to electrophoreticaly separation and identification <strong>of</strong> proteins in polyacrylamide gel. This work was supported by the International Science and Technology Center (Project T-1635) P14-018: THREE YEARS OF SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN ECOPHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND UV PROTECTION MECHANISMS IN TWO MOSSES FROM A SUBALPINE STREAM Tomás, R. - Fabón, G. - Monforte López, L. - Martínez-Abaigar, J. Núñez-Olivera, E. University <strong>of</strong> La Rioja We studied the relationships between environmental variables and the physiology <strong>of</strong> two aquatic mosses (Bryum pseudotriquetrum and Fontinalis antipyretica) in a subalpine unforested stream over a three year period. Neither environmental or physiological variables showed significant interannual variations. Most environmental variables (water temperature, stratospheric ozone, and photosynthetic, UV-A and UV-B radiation) showed distinct seasonal variations, but only a few physiological ones did. In both species, photoprotection variables (the activity <strong>of</strong> the xanthophyll cycle and the bulk UV absorbance <strong>of</strong> the methanolextractable UV-absorbing compounds, MEUVAC) varied more seasonally than variables related to physiological activity, such as the sclerophylly index and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (Fv/Fm and FPSII). Changes in physiological activity would be attenuated by the buffering capacity <strong>of</strong> water with respect to the influence <strong>of</strong> environmental factors, and dynamic variables like Fv/Fm and FPSII would be little determined by cyclic environmental factors. In B. pseudotriquetrum, both MEUVAC and kaempferol 3,7-O-diglycoside (a potentially UV-protective flavonoid) were positively associated with radiation levels, whereas in F. antipyretica photoprotection mechanisms were not correlated with any environmental variable. In addition, MEUVAC was 3–4 fold higher in B. pseudotriquetrum than in F. antipyretica. Thus, different photoprotection mechanisms, with a different environmental regulation, can be suggested for these two species. DNA damage was not found in any sample, probably because both species displayed efficient DNA repair mechanisms. P14-019: INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF OZONE AND CO2 ON GRWOTH, TIELD AND PHYSIOLOGY OF POTATO Hassan, I. - Hassan, I.A. Alexandria University Potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Kara) was grown in open-top chambers (OTCs) in Northern Egypt at ambient (ca 350 ppm) or doubled CO2 (ca 690 ppm) either in charcoal-filtered air (15 nl l-1) or in non-filtered ambient air (78 nll-1 O3) to investigate the changes in physiology and yield under long-term elevated CO2 and/or O3 throughout 100 days. Ambient O3 level reduced net photosynthetic rates, number and weight <strong>of</strong> tubers by 18, 41 and 21%, respectively, whereas elevated CO2 caused the opposite effect where it increased the same parameters by 44, 37 and 20%, respectively. Significant O3 x CO2 interactions were detected. However, O3 caused an increase in GR and POD by 18 and 35%, respectively, while CO2 caused an increase in POD only by 46%, and there was no effect <strong>of</strong> O3 and/or CO2 on other enzymes. The results <strong>of</strong> this study are discussed in relation to predicted atmospheric changes. Key words: Open-top chambers (OTCs) - Potato (Solanum tuberosum) – O3 – CO2 – photosynthesis – Stomatal Conductance – antioxidant enzymes – growth and yield. Superoxide dismutase (SOD); Glutathione Reductase (GR); Ascorbate peroxidase (APX); Guaiacol peroxidase (POD) P14-020: INFLUENCE OF MICROCLIMATE ON GRAPE- BERRY PROTEOME Bordey, Y. 1 - Kappel, C. 1 - Magnin, N. 1 - Lapaillerie, D. 2 - Dupuy, J. W. 2 - Vilain, S. 2 - Bonneu, M. 2 - Gomes, E. 1 - Delrot, S. 1 - Trossat Magnin, C. 1 1 ISVV-UMR EGFV 1287-INRA, Bordeaux, France 2 Plate-forme Protéomique, Université Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, F As many cultivated crops, grapevine may be particularly susceptible to climate change and hence, berry quality and production might be highly changed (White et al. 2006). Modification <strong>of</strong> the phenology timing and metabolite composition has been already observed (Pereira et al. 2006). In order to improve the knowledge on the impact <strong>of</strong> the microclimate on grape berries, we studied P
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress <strong>of</strong> the Federation <strong>of</strong> European Societies <strong>of</strong> Plant Biology changes in the proteome <strong>of</strong> field grown sun-exposed or shaded berries on the east or west side <strong>of</strong> the row and inside or outside the canopy. The proteome analysis from whole berries by 2-D PAGE revealed around 900 total proteins. Principal component analysis done with all protein spots ascertained three statistically different proteomes. This result suggested that microclimate conditions are significantly distinct according to berry position within the grape. Among proteins differentially expressed, some (rubisco, chalcone isomerase, abscissic stress ripening, 14-3-3 is<strong>of</strong>orms, thioredoxin-dependent peroxidise, ATP synthase and carotenoid dioxygenase) presented high variation <strong>of</strong> expression levels. The expression analysis by qPCR <strong>of</strong> several flavonoid gene showed that their transcript amounts were modified by berry microclimate. These results give particularly new insights in berry proteome and show microclimate-induced changes. Also, these data raise questions about the role in berries <strong>of</strong> proteins which abundance is modulated by microclimate changes. photodegradation on mass loss and subsequent biotic decomposition. We harvested litter from 25 native and introduced species growing in temperate ecosystems in Argentina. While direct photodegradative losses were relatively small overall, the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the effect with attenuation <strong>of</strong> UV and visible light was 12% and 65% respectively. When these litter samples were then placed on the soil surface for biotic incubation, we observed a strong and consistent (P
- Page 4:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 7 and 8:
PLENAR SESSION LECTUR
- Page 9 and 10:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 11 and 12:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 13 and 14:
PARALL SESSION LECTUR
- Page 15 and 16:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 17 and 18:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 19 and 20:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 21 and 22:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 23 and 24:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 25 and 26:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 27 and 28:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 29 and 30:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 31 and 32:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 33 and 34:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 35 and 36:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 37 and 38:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 39 and 40:
POST 04 POSTERS • Environmental S
- Page 41 and 42:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 43 and 44:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 45 and 46:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 47 and 48:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 49 and 50:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 51 and 52:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 53 and 54:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 55 and 56:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 57 and 58:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 59 and 60:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 61 and 62:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 63 and 64:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 65 and 66:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 67 and 68:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 69 and 70:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 71 and 72:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 73 and 74:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 75 and 76:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 77 and 78:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 79 and 80:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 81 and 82:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 83 and 84:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 85 and 86:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 87 and 88:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 89 and 90:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 91 and 92:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 93 and 94:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 95 and 96:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 97 and 98:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 99 and 100:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 101 and 102:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 103 and 104:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 105 and 106:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 107 and 108:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 109 and 110:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 111 and 112:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 113 and 114:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 115 and 116:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 117 and 118:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 119 and 120:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 121 and 122:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 123 and 124:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 125 and 126:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 127 and 128:
FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 129 and 130: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 131 and 132: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 133 and 134: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 135 and 136: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 137 and 138: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 139 and 140: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 141 and 142: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 143 and 144: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 145 and 146: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 147 and 148: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 149 and 150: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 151 and 152: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 153 and 154: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 155 and 156: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 157 and 158: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 159 and 160: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 161 and 162: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 163 and 164: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 165 and 166: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 167 and 168: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 169 and 170: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 171 and 172: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 173 and 174: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 175 and 176: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 177 and 178: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 179: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 183 and 184: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 185 and 186: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 187 and 188: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 189 and 190: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 191 and 192: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 193 and 194: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 195 and 196: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 197 and 198: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 199 and 200: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 201 and 202: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 203 and 204: FESPB 2010 - XVII Congress of the F
- Page 206 and 207: Author Index Aarts, M.G. S18-002 Ab
- Page 208 and 209: Cattivelli, L. P01-031 Cawly, J. P1
- Page 210 and 211: Gallego, B. P17-037 Gallego, P.P. P
- Page 212 and 213: Kersten, B. P10-017 Keskin, O. P05-
- Page 214 and 215: Miguel, C. S02-001, P01-122 Milhinh
- Page 216 and 217: Ramiro, M. P09-018 Ramon, M P13-002
- Page 218 and 219: Tanimoto, E. P01-045 Tarakanov, I.