Book of Abstracts - Geyseco
Book of Abstracts - Geyseco
Book of Abstracts - Geyseco
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
P - Posters<br />
good. Stems constitute major portion <strong>of</strong> the yield, both amount<br />
and quality. We have examined the role <strong>of</strong> different flowering<br />
pathways (vernalization, photoperiod, GA) on the regulation <strong>of</strong><br />
canopy structure in different timothy genotypes. Timothy flowers<br />
when critical day length exceeds and it does not require double<br />
induction for flower induction. Our results show that vernalization<br />
enhances flowering and the number <strong>of</strong> flowering tillers.<br />
There exists difference between genotypes in the flowering rate<br />
and number <strong>of</strong> flowering tillers after vernalization. Transcript <strong>of</strong><br />
two flowering genes, VRN1 and VRN2, were examined after vernalization.<br />
The level <strong>of</strong> VRN1 expression remained high during<br />
prolonged vernalization. The role <strong>of</strong> VRN2 gene is unclear in timothy.<br />
In 12 h photoperiod all examined genotypes remained at<br />
a vegetative stage, but in 16 h these genotypes formed flowers.<br />
A single GA treatment didn´t affect flower formation in timothy<br />
similarly as it has been shown for example in Lolium temulentum.<br />
Our preliminary results show that the regulation <strong>of</strong> flowering<br />
induction in timothy is unique compared to other grasses, ad<br />
currently we are analyzing sequencing data on various flowering<br />
pathways.<br />
P04-017: STUDYING THE MOLECULAR REGULATION<br />
OF VERNALIZATION IN LILY<br />
Zaccai, M.*- Lugassi-Ben Hamo, M. – Mazor, I.<br />
Ben Gurion University<br />
*Corresponding author e-mail: mzaccai@bgu.ac.il<br />
In lily (Lilium longiflorum), bulb vernalization is not only an<br />
obligatory requirement for flowering, but also the most important<br />
factor affecting flowering time and quality. However, the<br />
molecular regulation <strong>of</strong> the response to vernalization and <strong>of</strong> floral<br />
transition remains largely unclear in lily. Evidence mainly obtained<br />
from Arabidopsis and wheat indicates that the general pattern<br />
<strong>of</strong> the vernalization response, namely a floral repressor inhibited<br />
by cold exposure, is conserved among different species. Yet, the<br />
type <strong>of</strong> genes involved in the process differ between species. To<br />
identify candidate genes involved in the vernalization response in<br />
lily we took a differential expression approach. Lily bulbs were<br />
vernalized at 4oC (V) or kept at 25oC (Non Vernalized, NV) for<br />
9 weeks and subtractions libraries were generated to detect differentially<br />
expressed genes from V and NV meristems. Clone<br />
sequences were analyzed using annotations databases. Overall<br />
transcription (amount <strong>of</strong> mRNA from total RNA), as well as homology<br />
to known genes were much higher in V than in NV meristems.<br />
Clones from the subtraction libraries showed homology<br />
to genes involved in dormancy, chromatin modification and floral<br />
transition. This study represents a first step towards elucidation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the molecular regulation <strong>of</strong> vernalization in lily, and addresses<br />
fundamental questions regarding the conservation <strong>of</strong> the vernalization<br />
response among higher plants. Vernalization-related genes<br />
could be used in the future, to manipulate this trait in important<br />
crops.<br />
P04-018: IMPROVEMENTS ON MICROSPORE EMBR-<br />
YOGENESIS INDUCTION IN OLIVE: EFFECT OF VA-<br />
RIOUS ENDOGENOUS AND EXOGENOUS FACTORS<br />
Prem, D.¹* - Bueno, MA.² – Testillano, PS.¹ - Risueño, MC.¹<br />
¹Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, CSIC<br />
²CIFOR-INIA<br />
*Corresponding author e-mail: deepakandrewprem@gmail.com<br />
DP and MAB contributed equally to this work. The existing<br />
knowledge for the switchover from gametophytic to embryogenic<br />
pathway <strong>of</strong> microspores in trees is still scarce. Induction<br />
<strong>of</strong> microspore embryogenesis in olive has been reported by the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> isolated microspores in vitro system (1), and cellular<br />
markers <strong>of</strong> the reprogramming process have been characterized<br />
(2). In this work we have studied several critical endogenous<br />
(plant genotype, time <strong>of</strong> bud collection, microspore stage,<br />
thermal pre-treatment) and exogenous (media composition, carbon<br />
source, stress treatments after microspore isolation, culture<br />
temperature, cell density) factors that affect microspore embryogenesis<br />
induction. Some modifications on the pre-treatment, processing<br />
and microspore isolation methods have been developed<br />
to improve the protocol <strong>of</strong> the culture system. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> the<br />
microspore development and multicellular proembryo formation<br />
was accomplished by cytochemistry at light and fluorescence<br />
microscopy. Cold pre-treatment <strong>of</strong> buds and cold treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
isolated microspores with or without starvation inducing agents<br />
such as polyols showed a marked increase in frequency <strong>of</strong> embryogenesis<br />
induction. A cell density <strong>of</strong> 20 – 50,000 cells<br />
was essential to keep a congenial osmotic environment and the<br />
choice <strong>of</strong> carbon source had a marked effect on the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> embryogenic cells. Maltose provided an appropriate osmotic<br />
balance leads to the development <strong>of</strong> multicellular structures.<br />
These new insights <strong>of</strong>fer several clues to fine tune the microspore<br />
embryogenesis process in olive.<br />
Bueno et al. 2005. Acta Physiol. Plantarum 27, 695-702. Solís et<br />
al. 2008. Plant Sci. 174, 597-605.<br />
Work supported by MICINN projects AGL2008-04255 and<br />
BFU2008-00203.<br />
P04-019: UNCOUPLING DELLAS FROM GA-SIGNA-<br />
LLING DURING ARABIDOPSIS FRUIT DEVELOPMENT<br />
Fuentes, S.¹* - Alvey, L.² - Ljung, K.³ - Sorefan, K.4 – Harberd,<br />
N.P. ² - Østergaard, L.¹<br />
¹John Innes Centre<br />
²University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Sciences<br />
³Umeå Plant Science Centre<br />
4University <strong>of</strong> East Anglia<br />
*Corresponding author e-mail: sara.fuentes@bbsrc.ac.uk<br />
Fruit initiation and fruit development ensure the efficient survival<br />
and dispersal <strong>of</strong> flowering plants. These processes are energetically<br />
costly and, consequently, fruit development is tightly controlled<br />
by a complex regulatory network. The hormone gibberellin<br />
(GA) plays a pivotal role in this network and previous studies<br />
have shown that GA promotes growth by inducing degradation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the growth-repressing DELLA proteins. However, the extent<br />
to which DELLA proteins contribute to GA-mediated gynoecium<br />
and fruit development remains to be clarified.<br />
To shed light on this area, we provide an in-depth characterisation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> DELLA proteins in fruit-set and growth. We<br />
show that DELLA proteins not only regulate reproductive organ<br />
size but are also involved in the control <strong>of</strong> wider aspects <strong>of</strong> plant<br />
sexual reproduction. By utilising the facultative parthenocarpy<br />
phenotype <strong>of</strong> della mutants we show that RGL1 and RGL2<br />
are major repressors <strong>of</strong> pistil growth in the absence <strong>of</strong> fertilisation.<br />
And, for the first time, we demonstrate the existence <strong>of</strong> a<br />
DELLA-independent GA response which functions during fruit<br />
development. Our results show that DELLA proteins are key regulators<br />
<strong>of</strong> gynoecium and fruit development. Moreover, control<br />
<strong>of</strong> GA-signalling during fruit development is likely to rely on<br />
additional levels <strong>of</strong> complexity as suggested by the existence <strong>of</strong> a<br />
DELLA-independent GA response.<br />
P04-020: GENETIC AND HORMONAL CONTROL BY IN-<br />
DEHISCENT FOR FRUIT PATTERNING IN ARABIDOP-<br />
SIS<br />
Girin, T.¹* - Sorefan, K.¹ - Arnaud, N.¹ - Paicu, T.² - Fuentes, S.¹<br />
- O’Brien, M.² - Wood, T.¹ -<br />
Sablowski, R.¹ - Smyth, D.R.² - Østergaard, L.¹<br />
¹John Innes Centre<br />
²Monash University<br />
*Corresponding author e-mail: girint@bbsrc.ac.uk<br />
The bHLH transcription factor INDEHISCENT (IND) is essential<br />
to pattern the Valve Margins (VMs), which are specialised<br />
tissues where dehiscence <strong>of</strong> the silique takes place to release the<br />
seeds at maturity. We have previously shown that IND regulates<br />
P