Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi
Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi
Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
194<br />
CATHERINE DUPONT<br />
hence these perforations could not have been<br />
caused by trowels. Furthermore, these holes were<br />
covered with sediment, which makes it possible to<br />
reject their recent origin. In total, 20 perforated valves<br />
were observed. In spite of this limited number<br />
compared to the 3724 observed oyster valves,<br />
they could suggest that they were the result of<br />
tools used to gather the oysters.<br />
Among these 20 valves, 19 are right and only<br />
one is left; the latter was joined with a right perforated<br />
valve (Fig. 3-F). This whole specimen seems<br />
to correspond to the action of a tool which could<br />
have pierced the entire thickness of the oyster. The<br />
predominance of perforations on right valves is<br />
confirming evidence for their creation during<br />
gathering. When the oyster spat develops on a<br />
support, it is the left valve which takes a more or<br />
less concave shape that conforms to the shape of<br />
the substrate on which it is adhered. The right<br />
valve, which closes the bivalve, thus seems more<br />
vulnerable to the action of a collection tool.<br />
In order to have additional information on the<br />
tool or the tools used, these perforations have been<br />
analysed according to their shape and dimensions<br />
(Fig. 4). The dimension measured is the biggest<br />
opening of perforations. The confidence intervals<br />
make it possible, despite everything else, to take<br />
into account the variability of dimensions of perforations<br />
for each shape. This confidence interval is<br />
close to the extreme values of the size of the perforations<br />
because of the small number of perforations.<br />
It shows that the smallest perforations have<br />
rather round shapes while the largest more angular.<br />
These differences can correspond to different<br />
degrees of force applied when driving in the tool.<br />
The teeth of the tool could have a pointed tip with a<br />
more angular shape at the base.<br />
However, the presence of both round and<br />
angular impacts (Fig. 3-G and H) does not make it<br />
possible to exclude the use of two tools: one with<br />
a rounded tip, the other with a broader angular<br />
shape tooth.<br />
Several tools are used to exploit oysters: the<br />
dredger, the rake, double rakes and the mortise<br />
axe (Fig. 5, Clerc 1828). The mortise axe and the<br />
long handled rakes are intended for use in the<br />
intertidal zone.<br />
The low frequency of stigmata observed could<br />
correspond to raking of the marine bottom using<br />
various kinds of less destructive rakes rather than<br />
the mortise axe which would perhaps cause more<br />
perforations.<br />
3. ACTIVITIES LINKED TO THE EXPLOITATION OF<br />
OYSTER MEAT<br />
3.1. The selection of opened oysters<br />
Opening scars have been observed on 59% of<br />
the right valves and 67% of the left ones. The most<br />
frequent scar observed is a notch which is precisely<br />
8 mm wide at the edge of the oyster opposite<br />
the hinge. The opening movement with a knife<br />
seems to be standardized.<br />
Figure 4. Measurement of the larger dimension of perforations observed on oysters according to the shape of the stigmata (C. Dupont)<br />
MUNIBE Suplemento - Gehigarria 31, 2010<br />
S.C. <strong>Aranzadi</strong>. Z.E. Donostia/San Sebastián