29.12.2013 Views

Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi

Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi

Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

194<br />

CATHERINE DUPONT<br />

hence these perforations could not have been<br />

caused by trowels. Furthermore, these holes were<br />

covered with sediment, which makes it possible to<br />

reject their recent origin. In total, 20 perforated valves<br />

were observed. In spite of this limited number<br />

compared to the 3724 observed oyster valves,<br />

they could suggest that they were the result of<br />

tools used to gather the oysters.<br />

Among these 20 valves, 19 are right and only<br />

one is left; the latter was joined with a right perforated<br />

valve (Fig. 3-F). This whole specimen seems<br />

to correspond to the action of a tool which could<br />

have pierced the entire thickness of the oyster. The<br />

predominance of perforations on right valves is<br />

confirming evidence for their creation during<br />

gathering. When the oyster spat develops on a<br />

support, it is the left valve which takes a more or<br />

less concave shape that conforms to the shape of<br />

the substrate on which it is adhered. The right<br />

valve, which closes the bivalve, thus seems more<br />

vulnerable to the action of a collection tool.<br />

In order to have additional information on the<br />

tool or the tools used, these perforations have been<br />

analysed according to their shape and dimensions<br />

(Fig. 4). The dimension measured is the biggest<br />

opening of perforations. The confidence intervals<br />

make it possible, despite everything else, to take<br />

into account the variability of dimensions of perforations<br />

for each shape. This confidence interval is<br />

close to the extreme values of the size of the perforations<br />

because of the small number of perforations.<br />

It shows that the smallest perforations have<br />

rather round shapes while the largest more angular.<br />

These differences can correspond to different<br />

degrees of force applied when driving in the tool.<br />

The teeth of the tool could have a pointed tip with a<br />

more angular shape at the base.<br />

However, the presence of both round and<br />

angular impacts (Fig. 3-G and H) does not make it<br />

possible to exclude the use of two tools: one with<br />

a rounded tip, the other with a broader angular<br />

shape tooth.<br />

Several tools are used to exploit oysters: the<br />

dredger, the rake, double rakes and the mortise<br />

axe (Fig. 5, Clerc 1828). The mortise axe and the<br />

long handled rakes are intended for use in the<br />

intertidal zone.<br />

The low frequency of stigmata observed could<br />

correspond to raking of the marine bottom using<br />

various kinds of less destructive rakes rather than<br />

the mortise axe which would perhaps cause more<br />

perforations.<br />

3. ACTIVITIES LINKED TO THE EXPLOITATION OF<br />

OYSTER MEAT<br />

3.1. The selection of opened oysters<br />

Opening scars have been observed on 59% of<br />

the right valves and 67% of the left ones. The most<br />

frequent scar observed is a notch which is precisely<br />

8 mm wide at the edge of the oyster opposite<br />

the hinge. The opening movement with a knife<br />

seems to be standardized.<br />

Figure 4. Measurement of the larger dimension of perforations observed on oysters according to the shape of the stigmata (C. Dupont)<br />

MUNIBE Suplemento - Gehigarria 31, 2010<br />

S.C. <strong>Aranzadi</strong>. Z.E. Donostia/San Sebastián

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!