Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi
Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi
Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
230<br />
HORTENSIA DE VEGA, EMILIANO R. MELGAR, M. DE LOURDES GALLARDO<br />
de arqueología experimental en materiales conquiológicos”<br />
and “Proyecto de técnicas de manufactura<br />
del México prehispánico”, both under the<br />
direction of Adrián Velázquez (2007).<br />
The first project has an experimental archaeology<br />
workshop where different types of modifications<br />
of Ancient Mexico shell objects are reproduced<br />
(abrading, cuts, holes, incisions, and finishing),<br />
using tools and techniques referred in<br />
codexes and historical documents, or data recovered<br />
from archaeological contexts. In the second<br />
project, the manufacture traces are analyzed<br />
comparing them with archaeological specimens<br />
in three levels: macroscopic, using an optical<br />
microscope at 10x, 30x and 63x and with scanning<br />
electron microscopy (SEM) at 100x, 300x,<br />
600x and 1000x in high vacuum mode (HV) with<br />
signal of secondary electrons (SEI), and voltage<br />
of 20 kV.<br />
To avoid the need to apply a conductive coating<br />
over the pieces, detailed impressions were<br />
made with a thin tape of polymer with one drop of<br />
acetone, pressed it over the area that we want to<br />
analyze for one minute until it is dry. After that, we<br />
mounted each replica sample on 30 mm diameter<br />
aluminium stubs and coated all of them with<br />
an ultrathin coating of electrically-conducting<br />
material, commonly gold, by low vacuum sputter<br />
coating. By this way, we could analyze oversized<br />
pieces bigger than the 10 cm of the SEM chamber,<br />
avoid the movement of the objects from the<br />
museums to the lab, and optimize the time invested<br />
in the SEM by analyzing 20 samples per two<br />
hours. Following this technique, we had a 165<br />
pieces sample of the 1664 total pieces for the<br />
stereoscopical microscopy, and 28 for the SEM,<br />
in order to observe the abrading, edges, holes<br />
and polishing.<br />
The surfaces were abraded with lithic tools,<br />
without abrasives, because of the presence of<br />
intercrossed lines (Fig. 4). With the microscopical<br />
analyses we observed rounded bands of 100<br />
microns width, that correspond to the ones produced<br />
experimentally with basalt (Fig. 5).<br />
Figure 4. Archaeological surface (a) and experimental abrading with basalt (b) at 10x.<br />
Figure 5. Archaeological surface (a) and experimental abrading with basalt (b) at 100x.<br />
MUNIBE Suplemento - Gehigarria 31, 2010<br />
S.C. <strong>Aranzadi</strong>. Z.E. Donostia/San Sebastián