29.12.2013 Views

Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi

Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi

Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

230<br />

HORTENSIA DE VEGA, EMILIANO R. MELGAR, M. DE LOURDES GALLARDO<br />

de arqueología experimental en materiales conquiológicos”<br />

and “Proyecto de técnicas de manufactura<br />

del México prehispánico”, both under the<br />

direction of Adrián Velázquez (2007).<br />

The first project has an experimental archaeology<br />

workshop where different types of modifications<br />

of Ancient Mexico shell objects are reproduced<br />

(abrading, cuts, holes, incisions, and finishing),<br />

using tools and techniques referred in<br />

codexes and historical documents, or data recovered<br />

from archaeological contexts. In the second<br />

project, the manufacture traces are analyzed<br />

comparing them with archaeological specimens<br />

in three levels: macroscopic, using an optical<br />

microscope at 10x, 30x and 63x and with scanning<br />

electron microscopy (SEM) at 100x, 300x,<br />

600x and 1000x in high vacuum mode (HV) with<br />

signal of secondary electrons (SEI), and voltage<br />

of 20 kV.<br />

To avoid the need to apply a conductive coating<br />

over the pieces, detailed impressions were<br />

made with a thin tape of polymer with one drop of<br />

acetone, pressed it over the area that we want to<br />

analyze for one minute until it is dry. After that, we<br />

mounted each replica sample on 30 mm diameter<br />

aluminium stubs and coated all of them with<br />

an ultrathin coating of electrically-conducting<br />

material, commonly gold, by low vacuum sputter<br />

coating. By this way, we could analyze oversized<br />

pieces bigger than the 10 cm of the SEM chamber,<br />

avoid the movement of the objects from the<br />

museums to the lab, and optimize the time invested<br />

in the SEM by analyzing 20 samples per two<br />

hours. Following this technique, we had a 165<br />

pieces sample of the 1664 total pieces for the<br />

stereoscopical microscopy, and 28 for the SEM,<br />

in order to observe the abrading, edges, holes<br />

and polishing.<br />

The surfaces were abraded with lithic tools,<br />

without abrasives, because of the presence of<br />

intercrossed lines (Fig. 4). With the microscopical<br />

analyses we observed rounded bands of 100<br />

microns width, that correspond to the ones produced<br />

experimentally with basalt (Fig. 5).<br />

Figure 4. Archaeological surface (a) and experimental abrading with basalt (b) at 10x.<br />

Figure 5. Archaeological surface (a) and experimental abrading with basalt (b) at 100x.<br />

MUNIBE Suplemento - Gehigarria 31, 2010<br />

S.C. <strong>Aranzadi</strong>. Z.E. Donostia/San Sebastián

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!