29.12.2013 Views

Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi

Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi

Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

282<br />

ISABEL C. RIVERA-COLLAZO<br />

clypeatus, (García 2005: 371), which periodically<br />

move into abandoned mollusc shells and are very<br />

common on modern Puerto Rican shores.<br />

The ubiquity of these shells throughout the site<br />

might also indicate another anthropic subsistence<br />

activity. Claassen (1991, 1998) documents that<br />

periodical cleaning of fish traps in the Bahamas<br />

brought to shore molluscs and other remains that<br />

were not intentionally collected for economic or<br />

other sustenance activities. It is possible that fish<br />

traps were placed in Thalassia or other sea grass<br />

beds, or close to reefs, where fish could hide and be<br />

caught. The documented species are scavenging<br />

or grazing gastropods that could have crawled into<br />

the traps and be brought ashore with the catch and<br />

subsequently discarded during cleaning, providing<br />

proxy evidence of the use of this technology.<br />

4. CONCLUSION<br />

The shell remains from Punta Candelero support<br />

the conclusions suggested by the geoarchaeological<br />

analysis regarding the deltaic origin<br />

of the foreland. The present analysis suggests the<br />

occupants of the site used all the locally available<br />

environments, including rocky shores, sandy<br />

intertidal, consolidated and unconsolidated subtidal,<br />

and riparian habitats. The apparent absence<br />

of mangal habitat needs further examination.<br />

The assemblage also documents particular<br />

foraging practices. Rocky shores were exploited<br />

by collecting individual specimens, selecting<br />

them according to size. Sandy beaches were<br />

used for collecting Donax en masse probably<br />

using baskets or sieves. Subtidal environments<br />

(rocky and seagrass habitats) were exploited by<br />

the gathering of individual specimens. It is also<br />

possible that some of the molluscs were collected<br />

opportunistically during fishing trips.<br />

The data seems to suggest not all the shells in<br />

the assemblage were collected for sustenance.<br />

Some of the gastropods might represent fish trap<br />

cleaning practices. The neritids could have been<br />

consumed, but could also have been used as bait<br />

in traps or on hooks. Other shells could have been<br />

brought to shore accidentally, such as the<br />

Brachidontes exustus associated with large coral<br />

fragments that were being used for surface stabilization<br />

before erecting structures (Rivera-Collazo<br />

and Cross-Marsh 2007).<br />

The analysis of the faunal remains collected<br />

during the 2006 excavations suggests the inhabitants<br />

of Punta Candelero were maritime-oriented<br />

but had ample use of the terrestrial hinterland<br />

(Velez-Ramos et al. 2007). This shell analysis supports<br />

that observation, through the documentation<br />

of use of marine, estuarine and freshwater environments.<br />

This study sheds light on the complexity of<br />

maritime culture and the need to study in more<br />

detail the relationship between people and their<br />

contemporary landscapes. Further research is<br />

needed to challenge traditionally accepted ideas<br />

with high resolution data. In humid tropical<br />

regions, perishable organic materials are readily<br />

available, easy to use and resistant enough to survive<br />

everyday and long-term use. Nevertheless,<br />

this raw material is usually absent from the<br />

archaeological record, as the hot and wet tropical<br />

soils do not favour its long-term preservation.<br />

Thus, archaeological assemblages are dominated<br />

by shell, stone and ceramic tools that might<br />

reflect more the taphonomic than the anthropogenic<br />

processes. However, it is possible to use proxy<br />

evidence to support the use of particular technology<br />

that otherwise would be absent from the<br />

record. This approach will foster the deeper<br />

understanding of early human occupation on the<br />

Caribbean and their use of island landscapes.<br />

5. BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />

ANDREWS, E. A.<br />

1940 “The snail Neritina virginea L. in a changing salt pond”.<br />

Ecology, 21(3): 335–346.<br />

BIRD, R.C., SMITH, E. A. & D.W. BIRD.<br />

2001 “The hunting handicap: Costly signalling in human foraging<br />

strategies”. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol, 50: 9–19.<br />

BLANCO, J. F. & SCATENA, F. N.<br />

2005 “Floods, habitat hydraulics and upstream migration of<br />

Neritina virginea (Gastropoda: Neritidae) in northeastern<br />

Puerto Rico”. Caribbean Journal of Science, 41(1): 55–74.<br />

2007 “The spatial arrangement of Neritina virginea<br />

(Gastropoda) during upstream migration in a split-channel<br />

reach”. River Research and Applications, 23: 235–245.<br />

BINFORD, L.<br />

1980 “Willow smoke and dogs’ tails: Hunter-gatherer settlement<br />

systems and archaeological site formation”. American<br />

Antiquity, 45(1): 4–20.<br />

BORGERHOFF, M.<br />

2004 Human Behavioural Ecology Encyclopedia of Life<br />

Sciences. DOI: 10.1038/npg.els.0003671, article online<br />

posting date: May 3, 2005.<br />

BUSE DE LA GUERRA, H.<br />

1981 Actividad Pesquera: Editorial Andina. Perú.<br />

MUNIBE Suplemento - Gehigarria 31, 2010<br />

S.C. <strong>Aranzadi</strong>. Z.E. Donostia/San Sebastián

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!