Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi
Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi
Santander, February 19th-22nd 2008 - Aranzadi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
282<br />
ISABEL C. RIVERA-COLLAZO<br />
clypeatus, (García 2005: 371), which periodically<br />
move into abandoned mollusc shells and are very<br />
common on modern Puerto Rican shores.<br />
The ubiquity of these shells throughout the site<br />
might also indicate another anthropic subsistence<br />
activity. Claassen (1991, 1998) documents that<br />
periodical cleaning of fish traps in the Bahamas<br />
brought to shore molluscs and other remains that<br />
were not intentionally collected for economic or<br />
other sustenance activities. It is possible that fish<br />
traps were placed in Thalassia or other sea grass<br />
beds, or close to reefs, where fish could hide and be<br />
caught. The documented species are scavenging<br />
or grazing gastropods that could have crawled into<br />
the traps and be brought ashore with the catch and<br />
subsequently discarded during cleaning, providing<br />
proxy evidence of the use of this technology.<br />
4. CONCLUSION<br />
The shell remains from Punta Candelero support<br />
the conclusions suggested by the geoarchaeological<br />
analysis regarding the deltaic origin<br />
of the foreland. The present analysis suggests the<br />
occupants of the site used all the locally available<br />
environments, including rocky shores, sandy<br />
intertidal, consolidated and unconsolidated subtidal,<br />
and riparian habitats. The apparent absence<br />
of mangal habitat needs further examination.<br />
The assemblage also documents particular<br />
foraging practices. Rocky shores were exploited<br />
by collecting individual specimens, selecting<br />
them according to size. Sandy beaches were<br />
used for collecting Donax en masse probably<br />
using baskets or sieves. Subtidal environments<br />
(rocky and seagrass habitats) were exploited by<br />
the gathering of individual specimens. It is also<br />
possible that some of the molluscs were collected<br />
opportunistically during fishing trips.<br />
The data seems to suggest not all the shells in<br />
the assemblage were collected for sustenance.<br />
Some of the gastropods might represent fish trap<br />
cleaning practices. The neritids could have been<br />
consumed, but could also have been used as bait<br />
in traps or on hooks. Other shells could have been<br />
brought to shore accidentally, such as the<br />
Brachidontes exustus associated with large coral<br />
fragments that were being used for surface stabilization<br />
before erecting structures (Rivera-Collazo<br />
and Cross-Marsh 2007).<br />
The analysis of the faunal remains collected<br />
during the 2006 excavations suggests the inhabitants<br />
of Punta Candelero were maritime-oriented<br />
but had ample use of the terrestrial hinterland<br />
(Velez-Ramos et al. 2007). This shell analysis supports<br />
that observation, through the documentation<br />
of use of marine, estuarine and freshwater environments.<br />
This study sheds light on the complexity of<br />
maritime culture and the need to study in more<br />
detail the relationship between people and their<br />
contemporary landscapes. Further research is<br />
needed to challenge traditionally accepted ideas<br />
with high resolution data. In humid tropical<br />
regions, perishable organic materials are readily<br />
available, easy to use and resistant enough to survive<br />
everyday and long-term use. Nevertheless,<br />
this raw material is usually absent from the<br />
archaeological record, as the hot and wet tropical<br />
soils do not favour its long-term preservation.<br />
Thus, archaeological assemblages are dominated<br />
by shell, stone and ceramic tools that might<br />
reflect more the taphonomic than the anthropogenic<br />
processes. However, it is possible to use proxy<br />
evidence to support the use of particular technology<br />
that otherwise would be absent from the<br />
record. This approach will foster the deeper<br />
understanding of early human occupation on the<br />
Caribbean and their use of island landscapes.<br />
5. BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />
ANDREWS, E. A.<br />
1940 “The snail Neritina virginea L. in a changing salt pond”.<br />
Ecology, 21(3): 335–346.<br />
BIRD, R.C., SMITH, E. A. & D.W. BIRD.<br />
2001 “The hunting handicap: Costly signalling in human foraging<br />
strategies”. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol, 50: 9–19.<br />
BLANCO, J. F. & SCATENA, F. N.<br />
2005 “Floods, habitat hydraulics and upstream migration of<br />
Neritina virginea (Gastropoda: Neritidae) in northeastern<br />
Puerto Rico”. Caribbean Journal of Science, 41(1): 55–74.<br />
2007 “The spatial arrangement of Neritina virginea<br />
(Gastropoda) during upstream migration in a split-channel<br />
reach”. River Research and Applications, 23: 235–245.<br />
BINFORD, L.<br />
1980 “Willow smoke and dogs’ tails: Hunter-gatherer settlement<br />
systems and archaeological site formation”. American<br />
Antiquity, 45(1): 4–20.<br />
BORGERHOFF, M.<br />
2004 Human Behavioural Ecology Encyclopedia of Life<br />
Sciences. DOI: 10.1038/npg.els.0003671, article online<br />
posting date: May 3, 2005.<br />
BUSE DE LA GUERRA, H.<br />
1981 Actividad Pesquera: Editorial Andina. Perú.<br />
MUNIBE Suplemento - Gehigarria 31, 2010<br />
S.C. <strong>Aranzadi</strong>. Z.E. Donostia/San Sebastián