04.01.2014 Views

Broker-Dealer Litigation - Greenberg Traurig LLP

Broker-Dealer Litigation - Greenberg Traurig LLP

Broker-Dealer Litigation - Greenberg Traurig LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In re Smith & Wesson Holding Corp. Sec. Litig., 2011 WL 6089727 (D. Mass. Mar. 25, 2011).<br />

Investors brought a class action suit against gun manufacturing company and its officers<br />

alleging violations of federal securities laws. Defendants subsequently filed a motion to dismiss<br />

for failure to state a claim as required under the heightened pleading standards of the PSLRA.<br />

Plaintiffs claimed that defendants issued a series of public statements in which they<br />

misrepresented level of demand for products. The court granted defendants’ motion finding no<br />

evidence of scienter and that statements made by corporation regarding demand and general<br />

sales were not false or misleading.<br />

Hill v. State Street Corporation, 2011 WL 3420439 (D. Mass. Aug. 3, 2011).<br />

Plaintiffs brought a class action suit against defendants alleging violations of federal<br />

securities laws. Plaintiffs alleged defendants misled the market regarding the defendant<br />

company’s exposure when it assured investors in the fall of 2008 that debt securities contained in<br />

its investment portfolio collateralized in part by risky mortgage-backed securities—were of high<br />

quality. Plaintiffs further alleged that as a result of those improper statements plaintiffs suffered<br />

substantial damages. The court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss holding that plaintiffs<br />

satisfied heightened pleadings standard required under the PSLRA for their claims under the<br />

Securities Exchange Act of 1934.<br />

In re Boston Scientific Corporation Securities <strong>Litigation</strong>, 2011 WL 4381889 (D. Mass. Sept. 19,<br />

2011).<br />

Plaintiffs brought suit against defendant alleging violations of federal securities laws.<br />

Defendants then filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim as required under the<br />

heightened pleading standards of the PSLRA. Plaintiffs alleged that defendants made several<br />

misrepresentations or omitted to disclose information regarding unlawful sales practices leading<br />

to an artificial inflation of the company’s stock. The court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss<br />

finding that plaintiffs failed to sufficiently allege a material misrepresentation, omission and a<br />

strong inference of scienter.<br />

Casula v. AthenaHealth, Inc, 2011 WL 45661155 (D. Mass. Sept. 30, 2011).<br />

Lead plaintiff brought suit against defendants alleging violations of federal securities<br />

laws. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and failure to meet the<br />

heightened pleading requirements under the PSLRA. Plaintiff alleged that defendant, company<br />

and officers improperly amortized certain revenues over shorter terms instead of the expected<br />

D.1<br />

D.1<br />

D.1<br />

D.1<br />

129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!