04.01.2014 Views

Broker-Dealer Litigation - Greenberg Traurig LLP

Broker-Dealer Litigation - Greenberg Traurig LLP

Broker-Dealer Litigation - Greenberg Traurig LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

D.1<br />

Kuriakose v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 2011 WL 1158028 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30,<br />

2011).<br />

Plaintiffs, brought class action suit against defendants alleging violations of federal<br />

securities laws. Defendants then filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim as required<br />

under the heightened pleading standards of the PSLRA. Plaintiffs claimed that defendant<br />

corporation and its officers materially misrepresented the corporation’s exposure to risky<br />

mortgage products, the sufficiency of its capital, and the accuracy of its financial reporting<br />

resulting in inflated share prices. The court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss but gave<br />

plaintiffs leave to amend finding that plaintiffs failed to adequately plead the existence of<br />

actionable misstatements or omissions relating to exposure to non-prime mortgage loans, or<br />

capital adequacy. The court also found that plaintiffs failed to plead loss causation with respect<br />

to alleged claims relating to internal controls and financial statements.<br />

In re Merrill Lynch Auction Rate Securities <strong>Litigation</strong>, 2011 WL 1330847 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30,<br />

2011).<br />

Plaintiffs brought class action suit against defendants alleging violations of federal<br />

securities laws. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim as required<br />

under the heightened pleading standards of the PSLRA. Specifically, plaintiffs claimed that<br />

defendants made misstatements and omissions about the safety and liquidity of the Auction Rate<br />

Securities market in which plaintiffs had invested. The court denied defendants’ motion to<br />

dismiss finding that the two allegations made by plaintiff, taken together, supported that the facts<br />

that defendants’ continued to sell an illiquid product to investors with a need for liquidity and<br />

withdrawing support from the products while continuing to tout them as safe adequately alleged<br />

a strong inference of scienter. The court also found that plaintiffs reasonably alleged reliance<br />

because defendants’ represented and plaintiffs relied on the fact that auction rate securities were<br />

liquid instruments.<br />

Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 719 Pension Trust Fund v. Conseco Inc., 2011 WL<br />

1198712 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2011).<br />

Plaintiffs brought a class action suit against defendants alleging violations of federal<br />

securities laws. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim as required under<br />

the heightened pleading standards of the PSLRA. Plaintiffs claimed that defendants, an<br />

insurance company and its officers, failed to properly disclose potential liabilities relating to its<br />

inability to integrate nineteen separate computer systems of recently acquired insurance<br />

companies. The complaint went on to allege that this lack of integration often resulted in<br />

accidental payments over policy maximums and payments for uncovered incidents. The court<br />

D.1<br />

D.1<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!