04.01.2014 Views

Broker-Dealer Litigation - Greenberg Traurig LLP

Broker-Dealer Litigation - Greenberg Traurig LLP

Broker-Dealer Litigation - Greenberg Traurig LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

dismiss finding that plaintiff’s allegations sufficiently alleged that defendants substantially<br />

participated in the alleged misstatements, that plaintiffs sufficiently alleged reliance, that<br />

allegations gave rise to strong inference of scienter, and plaintiff’s allegations were sufficient to<br />

plead loss causation.<br />

Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. KPMG <strong>LLP</strong>, 2011 WL 4629299<br />

(N.D. Ohio Sept. 30, 2011).<br />

Investor filed putative private securities fraud class action alleging that company, its<br />

officers, and its outside auditor participated in fraudulent scheme and wrongful course of<br />

business that caused company to falsify its financial records by improperly recognizing revenue<br />

and manipulating its recording of expenses. Defendants moved to dismiss for failure to<br />

adequately plead scienter against corporate officers and outside auditor and failure to adequately<br />

plead loss causation against all defendants. The court denied the motion, holding that investors<br />

adequately pleaded scienter against corporate officers and outside auditor and that they had also<br />

adequately pleaded loss causation.<br />

Int’l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Limited Brands, Inc., 788 F. Supp. 2d 609 (S.D.Ohio<br />

2011).<br />

Investors brought class action suit against corporation and its executives alleging<br />

violations of federal securities laws and defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a<br />

claim as required under the heightened pleading standards of the PSLRA. Plaintiffs alleged that<br />

corporation’s executives made false or misleading statements to conceal reckless behavior. The<br />

court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss finding that investors’ claims that corporation<br />

participated in nefarious scheme by high-level executives to conceal problems within company,<br />

failed to sufficiently allege scienter; that investors’ claims that corporation’s executives would<br />

receive larger bonuses if stock price was inflated was insufficient motive to satisfy scienter<br />

requirement; that allegations of executives knowing but failing to disclose that its interactive<br />

software system was “doomed to fail” failed to adequately allege scienter given company’s $18<br />

million investment in system start-up, that many of the other corporate statements were either not<br />

false, not material, merely puffery or could not be directly attributed to any executive.<br />

Garden City Employees’ Retirement System v. Psychiatric Solutions, Inc., 2011 WL 1335803<br />

(M.D.Tenn. Mar. 31, 2011).<br />

Plaintiffs brought class action suit against defendants alleging violations of federal<br />

securities laws and defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim as required<br />

under the heightened pleading standards of the PSLRA. Plaintiffs claimed that defendants<br />

engaged in and/or materially assisted in a scheme and course of business to artificially inflate the<br />

D.1<br />

D.1<br />

D.1<br />

153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!