04.01.2014 Views

Broker-Dealer Litigation - Greenberg Traurig LLP

Broker-Dealer Litigation - Greenberg Traurig LLP

Broker-Dealer Litigation - Greenberg Traurig LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Commission’s complaint alleged that Awan, Koppel, and the other defendants fraudulently<br />

raised more than $2 million from investors in three offerings by means of fraudulent<br />

misrepresentations, including promises of imminent initial public offerings and/or substantial<br />

increases in stock price; misappropriated investor funds for personal expenses, and failed to<br />

disclose their disciplinary histories. The court permanently enjoined Awan and Koppel from<br />

violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws, ordered Awan to pay $655 in<br />

disgorgement plus prejudgment interest and a $10,000 civil penalty, ordered Koppel to pay $851<br />

in disgorgement plus prejudgment interest and a $10,000 civil penalty, and barred Koppel from<br />

participating in the offering of any penny stock. In related administrative proceedings brought<br />

by the Commission, Awan consented to the entry of an order barring him from association and<br />

from participating in the offering of any penny stock, and Koppel consented to the entry of an<br />

order barring him from association.<br />

In re Buchholz, Release No. 63800, 2011 SEC LEXIS 344 (Jan. 31, 2011).<br />

Q.1.c(i)<br />

The Commission accepted an offer of settlement from Buchholz, a registered<br />

representative of a registered broker-dealer. In an earlier criminal proceeding, Buchholz pleaded<br />

guilty to one count of wire fraud. The criminal indictment alleged that Buchholz engaged in a<br />

scheme to defraud his clients of more than $1.3 million through such tactics as forging client<br />

signatures, depositing client funds into personal accounts, misrepresenting that his clients had<br />

authorized redemptions, and misrepresenting to clients that funds would be placed into their<br />

accounts when he actually placed those funds into his personal accounts. The Commission<br />

barred Buchholz from association and from participating in any offering of penny stock.<br />

In re Zangari, Release No. 63923, 2011 SEC LEXIS 650 (Feb. 17, 2011).<br />

Q.1.c(i)<br />

The Commission accepted an offer of settlement from Zangari, a stock loan trader who<br />

was employed by several major Wall Street brokerage firms over an eleven year period. In an<br />

earlier action brought by the Commission, a federal district court entered a partial judgment by<br />

consent against Zangari, permanently enjoining him from violating the antifraud provisions of<br />

the federal securities laws. The Commission’s complaint alleged that Zangari knowingly<br />

engaged in a scheme to defraud broker-dealers in connection with the lending and borrowing of<br />

securities. The Commission barred Zangari from association.<br />

In re Sarnicola, Release No. 63924, 2011 SEC LEXIS 651 (Feb. 17, 2011).<br />

Q.1.c(i)<br />

The Commission accepted an offer of settlement from Sarnicola, a securities lending<br />

representative of a registered broker-dealer. In an earlier criminal proceeding, Sarnicola pleaded<br />

guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. The criminal indictment alleged that<br />

Sarnicola conspired to defraud the registered broker-dealer of money and property, and to obtain<br />

money and property from the broker-dealer by means of materially false and fraudulent<br />

pretenses. The Commission barred Sarnicola from association.<br />

405

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!