04.01.2014 Views

Broker-Dealer Litigation - Greenberg Traurig LLP

Broker-Dealer Litigation - Greenberg Traurig LLP

Broker-Dealer Litigation - Greenberg Traurig LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

D.1<br />

Brecher v. Citigroup, Inc., 797 F. Supp. 2d 354 (S.D.N.Y. 2011).<br />

Employees who participated in an employer’s stock purchase program brought action<br />

against employer, members of its board of directors, and board’s committee which administered<br />

the program, for alleged violations of federal securities laws. Defendants moved to dismiss for<br />

failure to state a claim as required under the heightened pleading standard of the PSLRA.<br />

Plaintiffs claimed that defendants failed to disclose the stock purchase program’s subprime<br />

mortgage exposure. The court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss finding that the employees<br />

failed to allege scienter through declarations concerning corporation’s overall business outlook.<br />

The court found these to be announcements of corporate optimism and not actionable as<br />

fraudulent misstatements.<br />

In re Lehman Brothers Securities and Erisa <strong>Litigation</strong>, 799 F. Supp. 2d 258 (S.D.N.Y. July 27,<br />

2011).<br />

Investors brought class action suit against a financial services corporation and its former<br />

officers, directors, auditors, and underwriters, for violations of federal securities laws.<br />

Defendants moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim as required under the heightened<br />

pleading standards of the PSLRA. Plaintiffs alleged that defendants made materially false and<br />

misleading statements and omissions regarding corporation’s liquidity risk and value of real<br />

estate holdings. The court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss in part and denied in part<br />

holding that plaintiffs sufficiently alleged material misrepresentations, scienter and loss<br />

causation by its former officers. The court found, however, that plaintiffs failed to allege<br />

material misrepresentations by auditor.<br />

In re Manulife Financial Corporation Securities <strong>Litigation</strong>, 276 F.R.D. 87 (S.D.N.Y. 2011).<br />

Investors brought a class action suit against a financial services corporation and its<br />

former officers, for alleged violations of federal securities laws. Defendants moved to dismiss<br />

for failure to state a claim as required under the heightened pleading standard of the PSLRA.<br />

Specifically, plaintiffs alleged that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions<br />

concerning the corporation’s risk management activities. The court granted defendants’ motion<br />

to dismiss finding that investors failed to allege a material misrepresentation, scienter and loss<br />

causation.<br />

D.1<br />

D.1<br />

136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!