23.01.2014 Views

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.9 Real option theory 97<br />

The science concerned with valuing real assets by taking these options into<br />

account is called real option theory. The tools to value managerial options in<br />

real asset are closely related to the tools used to value financial options. 19 The<br />

similarities arise because the ability to control or manage a cash flow stream<br />

represents an option. Another important similarity is according to [BT00] that<br />

equivalent martingale pricing techniques, as in equation (3.6), are appropriate<br />

to both real <strong>and</strong> financial options. The major difference, on the other h<strong>and</strong>,<br />

is that while financial options are almost always options on traded assets,<br />

the rights to controllable cash flows typically cannot be reduced to claims on<br />

traded assets. As [BT00] note, the determination of the risk neutral probability<br />

measure therefore is more complicated than is the case for financial options.<br />

In the case of power plants in a liberalized market these controllable cash<br />

flows can however theoretically be reduced to claims on traded assets, namely<br />

futures <strong>and</strong> options on electricity as shown in this chapter. Because of the<br />

incompleteness of the electricity market one however does not get much<br />

guidance on how to choose the risk neutral probability measure, as discussed<br />

in Chapter 3.7.1.<br />

Deng et al. [DJS01] gives an example on how a gas turbine can be assessed<br />

by valuing the corresponding spark spread options. By assuming that the<br />

start-up <strong>and</strong> shut-down times are short <strong>and</strong> that the facility’s operation <strong>and</strong><br />

maintenance costs are constant, they state that the value of º the plant gas is<br />

º<br />

T<br />

given by gas t›<br />

0<br />

C dt, t› where C is the value of a spark spread option<br />

with expiration at t <strong>and</strong> with the corresponding characteristics of the plant,<br />

namely p max <strong>and</strong> H, <strong>and</strong> T is the remaining life of the plant.<br />

In the same manner they show how a transmission asset can be assessed by<br />

valuing the corresponding locational spread options. Let C t› A» B be the value<br />

of a locational spread option between location A <strong>and</strong> B with expiration at time<br />

t. Let further A t› C B» be the value of an locational spread option between<br />

location B <strong>and</strong> A with expiration at time t, both with the characteristics of<br />

the specific transmission asset, namely its maximum power capacity <strong>and</strong><br />

transmission losses. The value of a transmission line connecting A <strong>and</strong> B<br />

with a remaining lifetime of T is then º<br />

T<br />

given by tr 0 C t› B C A t› B» dt.<br />

A»<br />

19 See Chapter 3.7 for an introduction to the valuation of options.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!