23.01.2014 Views

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

54 Risk management<br />

therefore has a unique solution <strong>and</strong> only the first order conditions need to<br />

be obtained. The famous diversification principle was here quantified by the<br />

non-perfect correlation between individual assets. The idea of not putting<br />

all your eggs in the same basket was not new, but Markowitz was the first to<br />

formalize <strong>and</strong> apply it to financial instruments.<br />

It can be shown that no matter what assumptions are made about the distribution<br />

of asset returns, if an investor has a quadratic utility function, utility<br />

is increasing in the mean return <strong>and</strong> decreasing in the variance <strong>and</strong> that<br />

only these two first moments matter. Therefore quadratic utility maximizing<br />

investors will only choose portfolios according to the mean-variance portfolio<br />

problem [Arr71]. The quadratic utility however has the unrealistic property of<br />

satiation in the sense that the utility will decrease with wealth beyond a certain<br />

point. Further, the absolute risk aversion will increase with wealth meaning<br />

that the dem<strong>and</strong> for a risky asset will decrease with increased wealth [HL88].<br />

Chamberlain [Cha83] shows that the most general class of distributions that<br />

allow investors to rank portfolios based only on the first two moments is the<br />

family of elliptical distributions. In the electricity market returns are not elliptically<br />

distributed, because of the spikes observed in the prices, as indicated<br />

earlier, why the mean-variance portfolio is very questionable. Actually in any<br />

market a portfolio with options will have asymmetric distributed returns. Further<br />

variance, which is a symmetric measure of risk, where potential upside is<br />

penalized just as much as potential downside is not a preferable property for a<br />

risk measure.<br />

3.4.1.3. Value at Risk<br />

Triggered by the mentioned difficulties with variance, a number of socalled<br />

downside-risk measures have been proposed in the literature<br />

[Roy52, Mar59, Bav78]. Value at Risk (VaR) is the downside risk measure<br />

that is most widely used today. The reason for this is the simple<br />

interpretation of VaR <strong>and</strong> because it is the risk measure that the Bank for<br />

International Settlements 5 has enforced.<br />

5 An organization of central banks.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!