23.01.2014 Views

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.4 Traditional risk management models 51<br />

management models can however give some insight into the challenges that the<br />

electricity market is facing.<br />

3.4.1. Risk measures<br />

Whereas deterministic problems are characterized by ’real’ numbers, such as<br />

costs or returns, stochastic problems are characterized by r<strong>and</strong>om variables.<br />

Naturally it is this stochastic variability that adds the risk component to the<br />

problem. We know that risk should be managed, but a natural question is<br />

how this risk should be measured. The simile taken from Gumerlock & Litterman<br />

[GL98] exemplifies the problem of how to measure risk:<br />

Leaving aside risk for a moment, consider the measurement of human<br />

size. Everyone knows qualitatively what large <strong>and</strong> small mean,<br />

but life gets more difficult when we want to express size in a single<br />

number. Either height or weight can be useful, depending on<br />

the problem being addressed. Each metric is appropriate for a given<br />

problem, <strong>and</strong> neither serves all purposes. Indeed, if one asks for a<br />

definite answer to the question of which metric is the best measure<br />

of size, the answer is that neither height, nor weight, nor a linear<br />

combination of them is the best measure of size. The best measure<br />

of size is the one most appropriate to the purpose for which it is<br />

intended.<br />

As with human size, the same problem arises when measuring risk. Actually<br />

risk is too complex to characterize with one number. On the other h<strong>and</strong>,<br />

management calls for a simple measure of risk, which should be easy to<br />

interpret. One single number has therefore traditionally characterized risk.<br />

A typical risk measure developed for this purpose is Value at Risk. Another<br />

type of risk measure is variance, which however does not possess a natural<br />

interpretation from a management point of view. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, it has<br />

been derived from the utility maximizing agent theory as the risk measure that<br />

would concern such an agent, of course under certain assumptions.<br />

We will here present the traditional risk measure, variance, the quantile based<br />

Value at Risk <strong>and</strong> the blunt stress test to give an idea of the variety of risk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!