23.01.2014 Views

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.1 Efficient frontier 177<br />

lG x 6 9 6 y jH 39 336x 40<br />

336<br />

1 iF<br />

l<br />

G S i5 j6 D i5 jH x D i5 j<br />

8<br />

g7<br />

D i5 j<br />

336<br />

iF 1<br />

S i5 j<br />

30<br />

lF 1<br />

4<br />

l<br />

9<br />

1<br />

0<br />

8<br />

70<br />

30<br />

lF 1<br />

4<br />

l<br />

9<br />

g4l<br />

G S i5 j6 D i5 jH<br />

(7.14)<br />

The marginal costs for production <strong>and</strong> pumping are, as seen, not present. They<br />

are typically very low <strong>and</strong> are negligible in this analysis.<br />

7.1. Efficient frontier<br />

The tightest risk constraint for which there exists a feasible solution to<br />

(7.3)-(7.12) is C min 5<br />

8<br />

657 million CHF. This means that the polyeder of<br />

feasible solutions is empty for risk constraints lower than C min , which hence is<br />

the minimum achievable risk.<br />

A number of optimizations were performed for different constraints on the risk,<br />

varying from C min to 2 million CHF, where the latter corresponds to a pure<br />

profit maximization without any regards to the riskiness of the portfolio. The<br />

maximum expected profit plotted against the risk constraint gives us the utility<br />

specific efficient frontier, which is shown in Figure 7.3. Any portfolio under<br />

the efficient frontier is inefficient, since there exists a portfolio with a higher<br />

expected profit at the same risk. This corresponds to the efficient frontier in the<br />

Markowitz portfolio optimization approach, where however risk is measured<br />

as variance [Mar52]. The efficient frontier is shown to be piecewise linear<br />

<strong>and</strong> concave, which is consistent with Corollary 6.13. The expected profit<br />

as a function of the maximum risk is strictly increasing for risk constraints<br />

tighter than 1325000 CHF. For looser risk constraints the expected profit is<br />

constant, as seen in Figure 7.3. The reason for this is that the risk constraint<br />

is inactive for C 1325000 CHF. The future position is then already at its<br />

maximum, x 10000 MW, as can be seen in Figure 7.4, <strong>and</strong> the production<br />

cannot be changed towards a more profit oriented dispatch. This would in the<br />

mean-variance case correspond to a full investment in the single stock with the<br />

highest expected profit <strong>and</strong> with short positions prohibited. The marginal value

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!