23.01.2014 Views

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S7 D7<br />

min 8<br />

0 if S<br />

i<br />

or D<br />

p otherwise<br />

l 6<br />

173<br />

The exercise functions, are in this case study only functions of spot price <strong>and</strong><br />

dem<strong>and</strong>, not inflow. The reason for this is simply to be able to visualize the<br />

exercise conditions in a 3D plot 3 <strong>and</strong> to simplify the interpretation of the results.<br />

These exercise functions are as before given by step functions<br />

g4i5 l<br />

p max if S S4i<br />

<strong>and</strong> D 6<br />

D4l<br />

0<br />

6 (7.1)<br />

otherwise<br />

i5 l<br />

g7<br />

(7.2)<br />

Due to the short horizon of two weeks no time component was taken into<br />

account in the thresholds. These thresholds are presented in Table 7.3 <strong>and</strong> the<br />

five spot thresholds <strong>and</strong> six dem<strong>and</strong> thresholds build up 30 different exercise<br />

functions for production <strong>and</strong> pumping respectively as in (7.1) <strong>and</strong> (7.2). One<br />

could introduce even more exercise functions, which of course would result<br />

in an equal or better expected profit. It would however not change the typical<br />

results that we want to analyze.<br />

The end water level constraint V end is obtained by running a one-year optimization<br />

starting in the beginning of October, corresponding to a hydrological<br />

year. The one-year optimization was a static one where the schedule was determined<br />

at the beginning of the period for the whole year as in (6.35)-(6.44).<br />

The reason for using a static dispatch is to keep the problem on a computationally<br />

manageable size. As argued already in Chapter 6.6.3.1 the low inflow in<br />

combination with the high prices in the winter implies that a basically full dam<br />

at the beginning <strong>and</strong> hence end of the hydrological year, which in Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />

starts in October, is a fair assumption. The margin in this one-year optimization<br />

was chosen to be 50 GWh. This together with a maximum water level of 1500<br />

GWh gives us a starting <strong>and</strong> end level of 1450 GWh in the one year optimization.<br />

The only output that interests us from this optimization is the optimal<br />

water level over time. The result is presented in Figure 7.2, where one can see<br />

the typical shape of the optimal water level with a low level in the summer <strong>and</strong><br />

a high level in the winter. One can see that major production is conducted in<br />

3 By introducing inflow in the exercise functions the expected profit increased only<br />

slightly with up to 1%, depending on the risk constraint C.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!