23.01.2014 Views

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

Hedging Strategy and Electricity Contract Engineering - IFOR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110 <strong>Hedging</strong> strategies<br />

maturity, <strong>and</strong> vice versa. A duration-like weighted life time of an electricity<br />

contract could probably be introduced, but since the duration method already<br />

in the fixed income market has mayor drawbacks, it would not be a suitable<br />

c<strong>and</strong>idate for an electricity hedging approach.<br />

The complicated price process of electricity, the complex contracts involving<br />

not only price risk, but also volume risk <strong>and</strong> the additional dimension of the<br />

production side calls for a more sophisticated <strong>and</strong> general hedging approach<br />

than the presented traditional approaches. We will in the next section introduce<br />

a hedging approach that we believe is suited for the electricity market, which<br />

we call best hedge.<br />

5.4. Best Hedge<br />

The non-storability of electricity <strong>and</strong> hence the impossibility to pursue<br />

cash-<strong>and</strong>-carry strategies in combination with the fact that futures <strong>and</strong> other<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ardized derivatives only are available at a limited number of nodes in<br />

the grid makes it difficult to find perfect hedges for electricity positions. With<br />

perfect hedge we mean a hedge that totally eliminates the price risk in a<br />

position. We know from Definition 3.7 that the electricity market is incomplete<br />

<strong>and</strong> hence that only a subset of all contingent claims are replicatable. It is<br />

therefore in the electricity market in general not possible to find such a perfect<br />

hedge .<br />

Our approach is instead to find the best possible hedge. If we return to Definition<br />

5.1, where hedge is defined as an action that reduces risk, usually at<br />

the expense of potential reward, it seems natural to state that the best hedge is<br />

a hedge that minimizes the risk, under some constraint on the expense of potential<br />

reward. This sounds similar to the optimal hedge ratio approach, but as<br />

mentioned, variance is not a good measure of risk in the electricity market, <strong>and</strong><br />

the optimal hedge ratio does not consider the costs associated with the hedge.<br />

In Chapter 3.5 we argued that CVaR is an appropriate risk measure in this market,<br />

hence CVaR will instead of variance be used as measure of risk. A hedging<br />

approach is needed that can h<strong>and</strong>le all types of complex electricity contracts.<br />

We believe that the best hedge is one such approach, which is obtained by finding<br />

the hedge that minimizes the risk, in terms of CVaR under the constraint

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!