07.03.2014 Views

standardization of environmental data and information - International ...

standardization of environmental data and information - International ...

standardization of environmental data and information - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

much replication was needed; employing more replication in time <strong>and</strong> space,<br />

by having more than one control site, would result in a more powerful test. In<br />

the end, however, there would still be some degree <strong>of</strong> uncertainty, even though<br />

with more replication the certainty might be 0.01 rather than 0.05. He knew<br />

from experience how time-consuming it was to develop a sampling strategy for<br />

pelagic work, <strong>and</strong> he knew that contractors would never accept having that<br />

many sites. Were they necessary? On the other h<strong>and</strong>, did the number depend<br />

on the variability between control <strong>and</strong> impact sites, so that if impacts were<br />

strong, then less replication would be needed?<br />

Etter confirmed that that was true. Power analysis made it possible to<br />

detect how many samples were needed to detect some level <strong>of</strong> change. That<br />

technique could be used if the level <strong>of</strong> change was known. Three factors<br />

affected a power analysis: sample size, how big a change was to be detected<br />

<strong>and</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> making an error. He encouraged claimants to<br />

perform a power analysis asking whether the proposed replication was<br />

sufficient. If the change was big enough, fewer samples would be necessary,<br />

but that would not be known until someone did a simulation to test what kinds<br />

<strong>of</strong> impacts to expect.<br />

The same participant also remarked that, while he agreed on the need<br />

for a before-after-control-impact approach to determine whether an impact was<br />

being detected, researchers were also trying to develop a mechanistic<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the functional responses to various types <strong>of</strong> impacts. In<br />

other words, they were not just looking blindly for an impact based on<br />

statistics; they also hoped to build a predictive model showing what events<br />

would lead to an impact. Such a model could then be tested through BACI<br />

analyses.<br />

Etter agreed that having such models would make it possible to take a<br />

different approach <strong>and</strong> to optimise the sampling design so that fewer samples<br />

would be needed. That was why he had said that the kinds <strong>of</strong> experiments<br />

proposed by Smith were an important prerequisite to the rest <strong>of</strong> the work. In<br />

presenting general sampling designs for detecting <strong>environmental</strong> impact, he<br />

was not advocating that things had to be done that way; if the other kind <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>information</strong> was available, different approaches could be taken. However, as<br />

such <strong>information</strong> was not yet available, he had suggested a basic sampling<br />

strategy.<br />

One participant <strong>of</strong>fered his quick calculation that it would take 21 fast,<br />

experienced taxonomists several years, at the rate <strong>of</strong> one month per core <strong>and</strong><br />

ten working months a year, to examine the nematodes in 216 core samples –<br />

445 INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!