POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
was not sufficient and in 2 other knees the bone<br />
block was broken. Femoral insertion of the graft<br />
was judged anatomic in 23 cases and acceptable<br />
in 4 cases.Tibial tunnels were easy to perform and<br />
provided satisfactory placements and directions in<br />
all cases. Clinical examination was satisfactory in<br />
27 achieved procedures.<br />
Conclusions: The four tunnels with U femoral<br />
fixation technique permits a safe and solid U<br />
fixation on the femoral side, an anatomic doublebundle<br />
reconstruction of the ACL and an<br />
independent tensioning of the anteromedial and<br />
posterolateral bundle. This procedure provides an<br />
economical and easy way to achieve an anatomic<br />
double-bundle ACL reconstruction with a<br />
satisfactory primary stability. It must be evaluated<br />
by a biomechanical study.<br />
E-poster #408<br />
ACL Hamstring Reconstruction. Comparison of<br />
Three Types of Tibial Fixation Devices<br />
Fernando E Barclay, Pilar, Buenos Aires<br />
ARGENTINA, Presenter<br />
Santiago Butler, Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA<br />
Jorge Cavallo, Buenos Aires ARGENTINA<br />
Pablo Lacroze, Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA<br />
IADT, Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA<br />
Background:<br />
Surgical reconstruction of the ACL is frequently<br />
performed with a quadrupled hamstring graft.<br />
Tibial fixation of this graft has been identified as<br />
the weak link of the construct.<br />
Objective:<br />
The purpose of this study is to retrospectively<br />
evaluate three different tibial fixation devices, and<br />
its influence in the clinical outcome.<br />
Method:<br />
Sixty patients underwent ACL recostruction with<br />
cuadrupled hamstring graft. Femoral fixation with<br />
a titanium crosspin device (Transfix-Arthrex) was<br />
performed in all knees. Three different types of<br />
tibial fixation were used.<br />
Group A (20 patients, 7 female and 13 male, mean<br />
age 28.2 years +/- 8.4) were fixed with a 10mm x<br />
35mm bioabsorbable interference screw (Delta<br />
Screw- Arthrex).<br />
In group B (19 patients, 11 female and 8 male,<br />
mean age 29.6 +/- 10.2) a 9mm x 28mm<br />
bioabsorbable interference screw (Arthrex)plus a<br />
staple as backup fixation was used.<br />
In Group C (21 patients, 6 female and 15 male,<br />
mean age 28.5 +/- 8.7) tibial fixation was<br />
performed with a 25mm x 9mm round threaded<br />
titanium interference screw plus a staple.<br />
All patients were operated by the same surgical<br />
team (a compaction drilling technique was used<br />
for the tibial tunnel) and followed the same<br />
rehabilitation program.<br />
They were evaluated using Lysholm score,<br />
lachman test, anterior drawer test, pivot shift test ,<br />
KT1000 arthrometric testing.<br />
Results:<br />
All sixty patients were available for evaluation at a<br />
mean follow up of 24 months.<br />
The results revealed no statistically significant<br />
differences with respect to clinical or<br />
instrumented laxity testing between the three<br />
groups.<br />
Conclusions:<br />
The different fixation systems of this study do not<br />
influence the late results of ACL reconstructions.<br />
E-poster #409<br />
Anatomical Description of the Anterior Cruciate<br />
Ligament Attachment with Respect to the<br />
Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles. Part<br />
2: Femoral Footprint<br />
Andrew Edwards, London, UNITED KINGDOM,<br />
Presenter<br />
Andrew A Amis, London, UNITED KINGDOM<br />
Anthony MJ Bull, London, UNITED KINGDOM<br />
Imperial College, London, UNITED KINGDOM<br />
The aim of this study was to describe the<br />
anatomical locations of the femoral attachment of<br />
the anterior cruciate ligament with respect to its<br />
anteromedial and posterolateral bundles. 22<br />
human cadaver knees with intact anterior cruciate<br />
ligaments were included in the study. The femoral<br />
insertions of the two bundles were identified and<br />
marked. Digital photographs were then taken and<br />
these images were transferred onto computer<br />
documents. Measurements of the attachments<br />
were taken with respect to their o’clock positions<br />
parallel to the femoral long axis and parallel to<br />
the femoral intercondylar roof. The centres of the<br />
bundles were measured in a high-low and a<br />
superficial-deep manner referencing from the<br />
centre of the posterior femoral condyle, and with<br />
respect to their positions within a quadrant<br />
described for this study. The results showed the<br />
bulk of the anteromedial bundle occurred<br />
between the 11.30 and 9.30 o’clock positions and<br />
the posterolateral bundle between the 10 and 8.30<br />
o’clock positions. Also the anteromedial bundle<br />
was found in zones 1 and 2 (20 out of 22) of the