07.03.2014 Views

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

was not sufficient and in 2 other knees the bone<br />

block was broken. Femoral insertion of the graft<br />

was judged anatomic in 23 cases and acceptable<br />

in 4 cases.Tibial tunnels were easy to perform and<br />

provided satisfactory placements and directions in<br />

all cases. Clinical examination was satisfactory in<br />

27 achieved procedures.<br />

Conclusions: The four tunnels with U femoral<br />

fixation technique permits a safe and solid U<br />

fixation on the femoral side, an anatomic doublebundle<br />

reconstruction of the ACL and an<br />

independent tensioning of the anteromedial and<br />

posterolateral bundle. This procedure provides an<br />

economical and easy way to achieve an anatomic<br />

double-bundle ACL reconstruction with a<br />

satisfactory primary stability. It must be evaluated<br />

by a biomechanical study.<br />

E-poster #408<br />

ACL Hamstring Reconstruction. Comparison of<br />

Three Types of Tibial Fixation Devices<br />

Fernando E Barclay, Pilar, Buenos Aires<br />

ARGENTINA, Presenter<br />

Santiago Butler, Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA<br />

Jorge Cavallo, Buenos Aires ARGENTINA<br />

Pablo Lacroze, Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA<br />

IADT, Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA<br />

Background:<br />

Surgical reconstruction of the ACL is frequently<br />

performed with a quadrupled hamstring graft.<br />

Tibial fixation of this graft has been identified as<br />

the weak link of the construct.<br />

Objective:<br />

The purpose of this study is to retrospectively<br />

evaluate three different tibial fixation devices, and<br />

its influence in the clinical outcome.<br />

Method:<br />

Sixty patients underwent ACL recostruction with<br />

cuadrupled hamstring graft. Femoral fixation with<br />

a titanium crosspin device (Transfix-Arthrex) was<br />

performed in all knees. Three different types of<br />

tibial fixation were used.<br />

Group A (20 patients, 7 female and 13 male, mean<br />

age 28.2 years +/- 8.4) were fixed with a 10mm x<br />

35mm bioabsorbable interference screw (Delta<br />

Screw- Arthrex).<br />

In group B (19 patients, 11 female and 8 male,<br />

mean age 29.6 +/- 10.2) a 9mm x 28mm<br />

bioabsorbable interference screw (Arthrex)plus a<br />

staple as backup fixation was used.<br />

In Group C (21 patients, 6 female and 15 male,<br />

mean age 28.5 +/- 8.7) tibial fixation was<br />

performed with a 25mm x 9mm round threaded<br />

titanium interference screw plus a staple.<br />

All patients were operated by the same surgical<br />

team (a compaction drilling technique was used<br />

for the tibial tunnel) and followed the same<br />

rehabilitation program.<br />

They were evaluated using Lysholm score,<br />

lachman test, anterior drawer test, pivot shift test ,<br />

KT1000 arthrometric testing.<br />

Results:<br />

All sixty patients were available for evaluation at a<br />

mean follow up of 24 months.<br />

The results revealed no statistically significant<br />

differences with respect to clinical or<br />

instrumented laxity testing between the three<br />

groups.<br />

Conclusions:<br />

The different fixation systems of this study do not<br />

influence the late results of ACL reconstructions.<br />

E-poster #409<br />

Anatomical Description of the Anterior Cruciate<br />

Ligament Attachment with Respect to the<br />

Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles. Part<br />

2: Femoral Footprint<br />

Andrew Edwards, London, UNITED KINGDOM,<br />

Presenter<br />

Andrew A Amis, London, UNITED KINGDOM<br />

Anthony MJ Bull, London, UNITED KINGDOM<br />

Imperial College, London, UNITED KINGDOM<br />

The aim of this study was to describe the<br />

anatomical locations of the femoral attachment of<br />

the anterior cruciate ligament with respect to its<br />

anteromedial and posterolateral bundles. 22<br />

human cadaver knees with intact anterior cruciate<br />

ligaments were included in the study. The femoral<br />

insertions of the two bundles were identified and<br />

marked. Digital photographs were then taken and<br />

these images were transferred onto computer<br />

documents. Measurements of the attachments<br />

were taken with respect to their o’clock positions<br />

parallel to the femoral long axis and parallel to<br />

the femoral intercondylar roof. The centres of the<br />

bundles were measured in a high-low and a<br />

superficial-deep manner referencing from the<br />

centre of the posterior femoral condyle, and with<br />

respect to their positions within a quadrant<br />

described for this study. The results showed the<br />

bulk of the anteromedial bundle occurred<br />

between the 11.30 and 9.30 o’clock positions and<br />

the posterolateral bundle between the 10 and 8.30<br />

o’clock positions. Also the anteromedial bundle<br />

was found in zones 1 and 2 (20 out of 22) of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!