POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
structure, but did not perform surgery on the<br />
discoid meniscus.<br />
The postoperative healing was asymptomatic.<br />
Within days the activity level was elevated<br />
compared to the pre-operative status. Physical<br />
examination showed free range of motion without<br />
clicking, catching or other symptoms affiliated to<br />
the discoid meniscus.<br />
The symptomatic cordlike structure we<br />
demonstrated here, does not refer to the MFL or<br />
one of the widely known intraarticular ligaments.<br />
We therefore conclude to have introduced a new,<br />
not yet described intraarticular cordlike structure<br />
of the childish knee. It might be associated to<br />
discoid menisci and is therefore an important<br />
differential diagnosis. Successful treatment<br />
contains cutting of the cordlike structure. The<br />
whole meniscus remains untreated and<br />
osteoarthritis following loss of meniscal tissue<br />
can be prevented.<br />
E-poster w/ Standard #757<br />
Vascular Risk Associated with Meniscal Repair<br />
using RapidLoc versus FasT-Fix: Comparison of<br />
Two All-Inside Meniscal Devices<br />
Steven B Cohen, Charlottesville, VA, USA,<br />
Presenter<br />
Mark David Miller, Charlottesville, VA USA<br />
University of Virginia Health Center,<br />
Charlottesville, VA, USA<br />
Introduction: Previous reports have documented<br />
the complications associated with use of allinside<br />
meniscal repair devices. Several studies<br />
assessed the risk to the neurovascular structures<br />
during meniscal repair using an all-inside repair<br />
and highlighted some potential concerns with the<br />
use of these devices. The current study evaluated<br />
the risk to the popliteal artery related to the use of<br />
two commonly used all-inside meniscal repair<br />
devices, the Mitek RapidLoc (12.5 ), and the Smith<br />
and Nephew FasT-Fix (curved).<br />
Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaver legs were<br />
used in this study (average age=72 years, range:<br />
63-76). The lumen of the femoral artery was<br />
identified and injected with barium. AP and<br />
lateral radiographs were obtained to ensure<br />
visualization of the popliteal artery and its<br />
anatomic location. One cadaver artery was unable<br />
to be cannulated, thus seven cadavers were used<br />
for the study. The needle applicator length on the<br />
FasT-Fix is 25 mm (17 mm with the penetration<br />
limiter) and 13 mm on the RapidLoc. Both<br />
devices were inserted into the posterior horn of<br />
the medial meniscus up to the hub of the needle<br />
under direct arthroscopic visualization. After<br />
needle insertion, a second set of radiographs was<br />
obtained. The distance between the needle and<br />
the artery was measured on each radiograph. The<br />
width of the tibial plateau was measured, and the<br />
shortest distance to the artery was calculated as a<br />
percentage of that distance. Distances for each<br />
device were compared for both views using<br />
student’s t-test.<br />
Results: Measurements taken from the<br />
radiographs obtained revealed the average<br />
distance from the needle to the popliteal artery to<br />
be 0.5 mm (0.5+0.8 mm, range: 0-2 mm) on the<br />
lateral radiograph and 6.0 mm (6.0+6.2 mm,<br />
range: 0-19 mm) on the AP radiograph using the<br />
FasT-Fix system. None of the RapidLoc needles<br />
were within 20 mm of the popliteal artery on<br />
either radiograph. When these distances for the<br />
FasT-Fix needles were calculated as a percentage<br />
of the tibial plateau width, the average was 0.9%<br />
on the lateral and 7.1% on the AP radiograph. The<br />
FasT-Fix device came within 3 mm of the artery on<br />
both AP and lateral radiographs in 43% of the<br />
specimens. The risk to the popliteal artery was<br />
significantly greater using the FasT-Fix devices<br />
when compared to the RapidLoc devices (p