07.03.2014 Views

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

prospectively with 151 patients having 1 year<br />

subjective and 38 with objective follow-up at an<br />

average of 586 days (range 342-2267 days). The<br />

dependant variable was patient satisfaction with<br />

outcome, graded ordinally on a 1-10 scale.<br />

Independent variables included various<br />

demographic, surgical, objective and subjective<br />

parameters. Diagnoses included instability<br />

(n=63), rotator cuff pathology (n=70) and<br />

associated anterior labral pathology (n=54).<br />

Multiple stepwise linear regression analysis was<br />

utilized to determine multivariate predictors of<br />

patient satisfaction .<br />

Results: Worker’s compensation, re-injury status,<br />

prior surgery and gender were significant for<br />

patient satisfaction (p>0.05). For surgical<br />

variables, there were significant differences in<br />

patient satisfaction for a torn biceps, articular<br />

cartilage pathology and use of thermal treatment<br />

(p>0.05). For Objective variables, there were<br />

significant differences in satisfaction for passive<br />

forward elevation and pain with cross-armabduction<br />

(p>0.05). For subjective variables, all<br />

question regarding pain and function were<br />

significant with satisfaction (p>0.05). ASES score,<br />

painless use of arm, pain with daily activities or<br />

recreation, returning to pre-injury competition<br />

level and age are independent predictors of<br />

patient satisfaction (R2=0.59).<br />

Conclusion: Univariate and multivariate<br />

determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome<br />

after SLAP surgery were established. Some<br />

specific surgical and objective variables were<br />

associated with satisfaction. However, subjective<br />

variables of pain and function had the most<br />

robust associations with satisfaction . Thus, in<br />

assessing the outcomes of SLAP surgery, we<br />

would like to emphasize the importance of<br />

patient-derived assessment of symptoms and<br />

function.<br />

E-poster #932<br />

The Interest of Arthroscopy in Shoulder<br />

Arthroplasty<br />

Yves Lefebvre, Strasbourg, FRANCE, Presenter<br />

Elias Dagher, Paris, FRANCE<br />

Franoois Bonnomet, Strasbourg, FRANCE<br />

Jean-Franois Kempf, Strasbourg, FRANCE<br />

Hautepierre hospital, Strasbourg, FRANCE<br />

Introduction: Total shoulder arthroplasty is mostly<br />

successful, however several factors can be<br />

involved in failure and poor clinical results. In this<br />

study, we report our experience in shoulder<br />

replacement arthroscopy trying to define its<br />

diagnostic and therapeutic indications.<br />

Materials and Methods: Between 1994 and 2000,<br />

12 patients with painful shoulder replacement<br />

underwent arthroscopy as a diagnostic or<br />

therapeutic procedure (11 hemiarthroplasty, 1<br />

total shoulder arthroplasty). Arthroscopy was<br />

performed with an average of 28 months (6-36)<br />

after arthroplasty. In this period all patients were<br />

placed on a conservative program (home<br />

exercises, outpatient physical therapy and<br />

analgesic medication) in order to avoid surgery.<br />

We used the Constant score for clinical evaluation<br />

preoperatively and the last follow up (average 19<br />

months, 6-72). X-rays and CT arthrogaphy were<br />

performed before arthroscopy. Postoperatively,<br />

rehabilitation program included early<br />

mobilization in all cases.<br />

Results: Arthroscopy established the etiologic<br />

diagnosis in all cases. It was a therapeutic<br />

procedure in 9 cases: 5 capsular release, 4 biceps<br />

tenotomy, 2 loose bodies (cement) removal and 1<br />

subacromial decompression. In 3 cases,<br />

arthroscopy was not sufficient to treat the<br />

problem. The first one needed a totalisation of the<br />

hemiathroplasty because of important glenoid<br />

cartilage damage. The second presented an<br />

important cement bar not removable by<br />

arthroscopy. In the third patient, we performed<br />

open repair for a massive rotator cuff tear.<br />

Postoperatively, the absolute Constant score<br />

increased from 25 to 43 concerning the 9 patients<br />

treated arthroscopically. Pain and shoulder<br />

function were significantly improved but there was<br />

no improvement in strength evaluation.<br />

Conclusion: Arthroscopy for diagnostic or<br />

therapeutic purposes in prosthetic shoulder<br />

appears to be reliable, safe, worthwhile and<br />

technically feasible. Although open revision of the<br />

shoulder replacement is sometimes required,<br />

arthroscopic management may be an effective<br />

alternative in certain cases. Biceps tenotomy and<br />

capsular release improve significantly pain and<br />

stiffness.<br />

E-poster #933<br />

Arthroscopic Repair of Type II SLAP Lesions<br />

with Absorbable Anchors<br />

Michael R. Redler, Trumbull, CT, USA, Presenter<br />

Aaron M Dommu, Trumbull, CT USA<br />

Steven P Fries, Trumbull, CT USA<br />

Lauren E Redler, Trumbull, CT USA<br />

The OSM Center, Trumbull, CT, USA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!