POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
prospectively with 151 patients having 1 year<br />
subjective and 38 with objective follow-up at an<br />
average of 586 days (range 342-2267 days). The<br />
dependant variable was patient satisfaction with<br />
outcome, graded ordinally on a 1-10 scale.<br />
Independent variables included various<br />
demographic, surgical, objective and subjective<br />
parameters. Diagnoses included instability<br />
(n=63), rotator cuff pathology (n=70) and<br />
associated anterior labral pathology (n=54).<br />
Multiple stepwise linear regression analysis was<br />
utilized to determine multivariate predictors of<br />
patient satisfaction .<br />
Results: Worker’s compensation, re-injury status,<br />
prior surgery and gender were significant for<br />
patient satisfaction (p>0.05). For surgical<br />
variables, there were significant differences in<br />
patient satisfaction for a torn biceps, articular<br />
cartilage pathology and use of thermal treatment<br />
(p>0.05). For Objective variables, there were<br />
significant differences in satisfaction for passive<br />
forward elevation and pain with cross-armabduction<br />
(p>0.05). For subjective variables, all<br />
question regarding pain and function were<br />
significant with satisfaction (p>0.05). ASES score,<br />
painless use of arm, pain with daily activities or<br />
recreation, returning to pre-injury competition<br />
level and age are independent predictors of<br />
patient satisfaction (R2=0.59).<br />
Conclusion: Univariate and multivariate<br />
determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome<br />
after SLAP surgery were established. Some<br />
specific surgical and objective variables were<br />
associated with satisfaction. However, subjective<br />
variables of pain and function had the most<br />
robust associations with satisfaction . Thus, in<br />
assessing the outcomes of SLAP surgery, we<br />
would like to emphasize the importance of<br />
patient-derived assessment of symptoms and<br />
function.<br />
E-poster #932<br />
The Interest of Arthroscopy in Shoulder<br />
Arthroplasty<br />
Yves Lefebvre, Strasbourg, FRANCE, Presenter<br />
Elias Dagher, Paris, FRANCE<br />
Franoois Bonnomet, Strasbourg, FRANCE<br />
Jean-Franois Kempf, Strasbourg, FRANCE<br />
Hautepierre hospital, Strasbourg, FRANCE<br />
Introduction: Total shoulder arthroplasty is mostly<br />
successful, however several factors can be<br />
involved in failure and poor clinical results. In this<br />
study, we report our experience in shoulder<br />
replacement arthroscopy trying to define its<br />
diagnostic and therapeutic indications.<br />
Materials and Methods: Between 1994 and 2000,<br />
12 patients with painful shoulder replacement<br />
underwent arthroscopy as a diagnostic or<br />
therapeutic procedure (11 hemiarthroplasty, 1<br />
total shoulder arthroplasty). Arthroscopy was<br />
performed with an average of 28 months (6-36)<br />
after arthroplasty. In this period all patients were<br />
placed on a conservative program (home<br />
exercises, outpatient physical therapy and<br />
analgesic medication) in order to avoid surgery.<br />
We used the Constant score for clinical evaluation<br />
preoperatively and the last follow up (average 19<br />
months, 6-72). X-rays and CT arthrogaphy were<br />
performed before arthroscopy. Postoperatively,<br />
rehabilitation program included early<br />
mobilization in all cases.<br />
Results: Arthroscopy established the etiologic<br />
diagnosis in all cases. It was a therapeutic<br />
procedure in 9 cases: 5 capsular release, 4 biceps<br />
tenotomy, 2 loose bodies (cement) removal and 1<br />
subacromial decompression. In 3 cases,<br />
arthroscopy was not sufficient to treat the<br />
problem. The first one needed a totalisation of the<br />
hemiathroplasty because of important glenoid<br />
cartilage damage. The second presented an<br />
important cement bar not removable by<br />
arthroscopy. In the third patient, we performed<br />
open repair for a massive rotator cuff tear.<br />
Postoperatively, the absolute Constant score<br />
increased from 25 to 43 concerning the 9 patients<br />
treated arthroscopically. Pain and shoulder<br />
function were significantly improved but there was<br />
no improvement in strength evaluation.<br />
Conclusion: Arthroscopy for diagnostic or<br />
therapeutic purposes in prosthetic shoulder<br />
appears to be reliable, safe, worthwhile and<br />
technically feasible. Although open revision of the<br />
shoulder replacement is sometimes required,<br />
arthroscopic management may be an effective<br />
alternative in certain cases. Biceps tenotomy and<br />
capsular release improve significantly pain and<br />
stiffness.<br />
E-poster #933<br />
Arthroscopic Repair of Type II SLAP Lesions<br />
with Absorbable Anchors<br />
Michael R. Redler, Trumbull, CT, USA, Presenter<br />
Aaron M Dommu, Trumbull, CT USA<br />
Steven P Fries, Trumbull, CT USA<br />
Lauren E Redler, Trumbull, CT USA<br />
The OSM Center, Trumbull, CT, USA