07.03.2014 Views

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Results: The mean follow-up time for assessment<br />

for each of the 3 groups of patients were;<br />

Unicondylar = 3.32 years, Primary = 5.30 years and<br />

Revision = 5.06 years. The mean total WOMAC<br />

scores for the 3 groups were; Unicondylar = 13.96,<br />

Primary = 22.10, and Revision = 38.67. The<br />

percentage of patients who underwent knee<br />

arthroplasty that found it impossible to kneel<br />

were; Unicondylar = 18%, Primary = 36% and<br />

Revision = 66%. The commonest reasons why<br />

patients found kneeling difficult were; pain and<br />

stiffness around the knee prosthesis, fear of<br />

harming the prosthesis and sensory deficit around<br />

the knee. Visual Analogue Pain scores for<br />

kneeling in the 3 patient groups were, Unicondylar<br />

= 5.6, Primary = 7.12, Revision = 9.18. A minimum<br />

of 30% of patients in each of the 3 groups reported<br />

their daily lives were moderately-severely affected<br />

due to their difficulty in kneeling following knee<br />

arthroplasty. At least 60% of the patients in each<br />

group reported they would like to have better<br />

kneeling ability.<br />

Conclusion: Unicondylar knee arthroplasty<br />

patients have better WOMAC scores and find<br />

kneeling easier than patients who have undergone<br />

Primary knee arthroplasty (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!