07.03.2014 Views

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

epicondylar axis (EA) or the posterior condylar<br />

axis (PCA) have all been used to locate the<br />

optimal position for femoral component rotation.<br />

We have assessed the anterior femoral cortical<br />

line (AFCL) as a reproducible landmark in the<br />

femur.<br />

Methods:<br />

We analysed the rotational position of the AFCL<br />

with respect to the EA using axial MRI scans of 32<br />

knees. Each line was identified using defined<br />

criteria and reproducible landmarks and the angle<br />

between them measured on the medial side of the<br />

axial slice to determine a mean value. The process<br />

was repeated for the APA and the PCA and the<br />

results analysed.<br />

Results:<br />

The mean total value for the AFCL with respect to<br />

the EA was 11.3º (range 5 - 18, Standard Deviation<br />

3.22) measured on the medial side of the knee<br />

(internally rotated with respect to the EA). There<br />

was no statistically significant difference between<br />

right and left knees or men and women.<br />

Measurements derived from the other landmarks<br />

were similarly consistent.<br />

Conclusion:<br />

The anterior femoral cortical line is a<br />

reproducible landmark in the knee with a<br />

relatively consistent relationship with other axes<br />

of femoral rotation. It may be useful when<br />

determining optimal rotation for the femoral<br />

component, particularly in revision surgery or<br />

other circumstances where other landmarks may<br />

be lost. We are currently analysing greater<br />

numbers to confirm the data presented in this<br />

initial study.<br />

E-poster #541<br />

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Baseline<br />

Information from the North American Knee<br />

Arthroplasty Revision (NAKAR) Study Group.<br />

North American Knee Arthroplasty Revision<br />

(NAKAR), USA<br />

Edward Ranier Santos, Minneapolis, Minnesot<br />

USA<br />

Khaled J. Saleh, Charlottesville, VAUSA<br />

Kevin James Mulhall, Charlottesville, VA USA<br />

Presenter<br />

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA<br />

Introduction: Revision total knee arthroplasty<br />

(TKAR) is on the rise. There is a paucity of<br />

information regarding the demographic<br />

characteristics, etiology or mode of failure,<br />

functional disability, and socioeconomic status of<br />

patients Presenter for TKAR. The objective of this<br />

seventeen-center prospective study is to<br />

document pertinent baseline information on<br />

candidates for TKAR.<br />

Methods: The cohort consisted of 290 consecutive<br />

subjects Presenter for TKAR from March 2002 to<br />

December 2003. Baseline demographic data were<br />

retrieved from standard patient-completed<br />

questionnaires. Relevant clinical information was<br />

obtained from surgeon-completed documents.<br />

Subjects enrolled in the study also completed<br />

quality of life and functional questionnaires,<br />

including the Short-form 36 (SF-36) and Western<br />

Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC)<br />

Osteoarthritis Index. Modes of failure were also<br />

recorded.<br />

Results: There were 137 males and 153 females<br />

with a mean age of 68.6 years (34 to 85 years). The<br />

mean SF-36 and WOMAC score at baseline<br />

indicated significant functional disability. The<br />

subjects were composed of Caucasian (83%),<br />

African-American (14%) and other races (3%).<br />

Approximately 20% of the subjects had only<br />

primary education, 34% graduated from high<br />

school, 22% had some college education, 13%<br />

graduated from college, and 9% had a<br />

postgraduate degree. Thirty-nine percent of the<br />

patients had an annual household income below<br />

$25,000; 31% were in the $25,000-$50,000 bracket,<br />

and 22% had annual incomes greater than<br />

$55,000. The predominant modes of failure were<br />

instability (28.9%), tibial osteolysis (27.5%),<br />

polyethylene wear (24.5%), femoral osteolysis<br />

(22.5 %) and tibial loosening (22.2%)<br />

Conclusion: We were able to define baseline<br />

demographics for 290 consecutive TKAR cases.<br />

The results show that these patients are relatively<br />

young, and considerably disabled by their failed<br />

primary procedure. Majority of the patients had<br />

lower educational and income status, and lacked<br />

health care coverage, a fact that becomes more<br />

significant in light of the generally high cost of<br />

these revision procedures, as well as the greater<br />

awareness of health care cost in general. The<br />

modes of failure were similar to those in previous<br />

studies and consist of instability,osteolysis,<br />

polyethylene wear, and aseptic loosening. The<br />

findings give us insight into the specific groups of<br />

TKA patients that are at risk for failure and may<br />

allows the formulation of measures and proper<br />

resource allocation that may prevent TKARs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!