POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
epicondylar axis (EA) or the posterior condylar<br />
axis (PCA) have all been used to locate the<br />
optimal position for femoral component rotation.<br />
We have assessed the anterior femoral cortical<br />
line (AFCL) as a reproducible landmark in the<br />
femur.<br />
Methods:<br />
We analysed the rotational position of the AFCL<br />
with respect to the EA using axial MRI scans of 32<br />
knees. Each line was identified using defined<br />
criteria and reproducible landmarks and the angle<br />
between them measured on the medial side of the<br />
axial slice to determine a mean value. The process<br />
was repeated for the APA and the PCA and the<br />
results analysed.<br />
Results:<br />
The mean total value for the AFCL with respect to<br />
the EA was 11.3º (range 5 - 18, Standard Deviation<br />
3.22) measured on the medial side of the knee<br />
(internally rotated with respect to the EA). There<br />
was no statistically significant difference between<br />
right and left knees or men and women.<br />
Measurements derived from the other landmarks<br />
were similarly consistent.<br />
Conclusion:<br />
The anterior femoral cortical line is a<br />
reproducible landmark in the knee with a<br />
relatively consistent relationship with other axes<br />
of femoral rotation. It may be useful when<br />
determining optimal rotation for the femoral<br />
component, particularly in revision surgery or<br />
other circumstances where other landmarks may<br />
be lost. We are currently analysing greater<br />
numbers to confirm the data presented in this<br />
initial study.<br />
E-poster #541<br />
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Baseline<br />
Information from the North American Knee<br />
Arthroplasty Revision (NAKAR) Study Group.<br />
North American Knee Arthroplasty Revision<br />
(NAKAR), USA<br />
Edward Ranier Santos, Minneapolis, Minnesot<br />
USA<br />
Khaled J. Saleh, Charlottesville, VAUSA<br />
Kevin James Mulhall, Charlottesville, VA USA<br />
Presenter<br />
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA<br />
Introduction: Revision total knee arthroplasty<br />
(TKAR) is on the rise. There is a paucity of<br />
information regarding the demographic<br />
characteristics, etiology or mode of failure,<br />
functional disability, and socioeconomic status of<br />
patients Presenter for TKAR. The objective of this<br />
seventeen-center prospective study is to<br />
document pertinent baseline information on<br />
candidates for TKAR.<br />
Methods: The cohort consisted of 290 consecutive<br />
subjects Presenter for TKAR from March 2002 to<br />
December 2003. Baseline demographic data were<br />
retrieved from standard patient-completed<br />
questionnaires. Relevant clinical information was<br />
obtained from surgeon-completed documents.<br />
Subjects enrolled in the study also completed<br />
quality of life and functional questionnaires,<br />
including the Short-form 36 (SF-36) and Western<br />
Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC)<br />
Osteoarthritis Index. Modes of failure were also<br />
recorded.<br />
Results: There were 137 males and 153 females<br />
with a mean age of 68.6 years (34 to 85 years). The<br />
mean SF-36 and WOMAC score at baseline<br />
indicated significant functional disability. The<br />
subjects were composed of Caucasian (83%),<br />
African-American (14%) and other races (3%).<br />
Approximately 20% of the subjects had only<br />
primary education, 34% graduated from high<br />
school, 22% had some college education, 13%<br />
graduated from college, and 9% had a<br />
postgraduate degree. Thirty-nine percent of the<br />
patients had an annual household income below<br />
$25,000; 31% were in the $25,000-$50,000 bracket,<br />
and 22% had annual incomes greater than<br />
$55,000. The predominant modes of failure were<br />
instability (28.9%), tibial osteolysis (27.5%),<br />
polyethylene wear (24.5%), femoral osteolysis<br />
(22.5 %) and tibial loosening (22.2%)<br />
Conclusion: We were able to define baseline<br />
demographics for 290 consecutive TKAR cases.<br />
The results show that these patients are relatively<br />
young, and considerably disabled by their failed<br />
primary procedure. Majority of the patients had<br />
lower educational and income status, and lacked<br />
health care coverage, a fact that becomes more<br />
significant in light of the generally high cost of<br />
these revision procedures, as well as the greater<br />
awareness of health care cost in general. The<br />
modes of failure were similar to those in previous<br />
studies and consist of instability,osteolysis,<br />
polyethylene wear, and aseptic loosening. The<br />
findings give us insight into the specific groups of<br />
TKA patients that are at risk for failure and may<br />
allows the formulation of measures and proper<br />
resource allocation that may prevent TKARs.