07.03.2014 Views

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

North Cheshire NHS Trust, Warrington, UNITED<br />

KINGDOM<br />

Introduction<br />

Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate<br />

ligament (ACL) reconstruction has become the<br />

technique of choice for the majority of surgeons.<br />

There are different operative techniques to<br />

implant the graft especially concerning the<br />

method of femoral tunnel placement. Tunnel<br />

misplacement is the most common technical error<br />

which leads to graft failure. Tunnel placement is<br />

probably the single most important variable that<br />

the surgeon can influence in achieving a<br />

successful outcome<br />

The purpose of this study was to compare two<br />

techniques of determining the site of the femoral<br />

tunnel. The first utilising fluoroscopic intraoperative<br />

image guidance(IG) to aid in positioning<br />

of the tunnel , the second without any IG.<br />

Acceptable position for tunnel placement was<br />

decided on review of the literature and the postoperative<br />

radiographs of both groups were<br />

assessed using the method described by Amis et<br />

al (ESSKA Scientific Workshop).<br />

Patients and Methods<br />

From June 2001 two consecutive series of 12<br />

patients with chronic ACL injuries had<br />

reconstruction operations by the same surgeon<br />

(the senior author). We included only patients<br />

with unilateral ACL rupture who had no previous<br />

intra-articular graft surgery. In the first group the<br />

femoral tunnel placement was image guided , in<br />

the second no guidance was used. The post<br />

operative radiographs were evaluated and the<br />

position of the femoral tunnel noted on the lateral<br />

radiograph.<br />

The results were recorded onto a database<br />

(microsoft excel) and analysed.<br />

Results and discussion<br />

No significant difference in the position of the<br />

femoral tunnel was noted between the two<br />

groups. There was no signifiicant difference in<br />

their clinical outcome scores.<br />

The use of IG does not significantly improve the<br />

positioning of the femoral tunnel and therefore<br />

the outcome of the surgery. The authors do not<br />

recomend its use for this purpose.<br />

E-poster #351<br />

Spur-like lesion on the Lateral Tibial Condyle:<br />

A Sign of Chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament<br />

Tear<br />

Sung Do Cho, Ulsan, KOREA, Presenter<br />

Jong Ken Woo, Ulsan, KOREA<br />

Chae Chil Lee, Ulsan, KOREA<br />

Dept. of Ortho. Surg., Ulsan University Hospital,<br />

Ulsan, KOREA<br />

Introduction: Authors have found that some<br />

patients with chronic anterior cruciate ligament<br />

(ACL) tear had spur-like lesion on the lateral tibial<br />

condyle which was different from lateral capsular<br />

sign or degenerative spur. The purpose of this<br />

study is to evaluate the spur-like lesion and its<br />

significance in relation with chronic ACL tear.<br />

Material and Method: Six patients had spur-like<br />

lesion on the lateral tibial condyle in simple<br />

roentgenogram. The location, shape, and size of<br />

the lesions were studied using anteroposterior<br />

roentgenogram and magnetic resonance imaging.<br />

The cause of primary injury, chronicity of the ACL<br />

tear and associated injury were also analyzed. All<br />

6 patients were male and mean age was 33.8(17 -<br />

46) years<br />

Results: The spur-like lesions were located from<br />

the level of 3.8 mm in average below the articular<br />

surface of the lateral tibial condyle to the apex of<br />

the fibular head and were protruded laterally or<br />

inferolaterally from just posterior to the Gerdy’s<br />

tubercle. Their shapes were triangular with either<br />

round or sharp ends. Average length of the lesion<br />

was 6.0 mm and average width of the base, 9.2<br />

mm. The causes of primary injury were sports<br />

trauma in 5 cases and traffic accident in one. The<br />

chronicity of the ACL tear was from 8 months to<br />

23 years. Medial meniscus tear was associated in<br />

all cases and lateral meniscus tear, in three.<br />

Conclusion: We suggest that a patient who has a<br />

history of trauma with the spur-like lesion on the<br />

lateral tibial condyle of the knee is expected to<br />

have chronic ACL tear and the spur-like lesion is<br />

thought to be a healed Segond’s fracture (lateral<br />

capsular sign).<br />

E-poster #352<br />

Tibial Interference Screw Position in Soft<br />

Tissue ACL Graft Fixation: Biomechanical<br />

Considerations<br />

David A. Hayes, Brisbane, QLD AUSTRALIA,<br />

Presenter<br />

Mark C Watts, Brisbane, QLD AUSTRALIA<br />

Gregory A Tevelen, Brisbane, QLD AUSTRALIA<br />

Ross W Crawford, Brisbane, QLD AUSTRALIA<br />

Brisbane Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine<br />

Centre, Brisbane, QLD, AUSTRALIA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!