07.03.2014 Views

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury, is<br />

inadequate for qualitative evaluation of the<br />

severity and site of the MCL injury. Among the<br />

various reported MRI classifications of MCL injury,<br />

the most frequently used methods include the<br />

Mink and Deutsch(M&D) classification, which<br />

evaluates the superficial layer of the MCL, and the<br />

Petermann classification, which evaluates both<br />

the superficial and deep layers of the MCL. How<br />

these systems relate to clinical instability, which<br />

informs surgical indication, remains obscure.<br />

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to<br />

examine the usefulness and limitations of the<br />

M&D and Petermann classifications of MCL<br />

injuries that have been commonly employed in<br />

recent years.<br />

Methods: 24 patients with MCL injury underwent<br />

MRI and treated surgically within one week of<br />

injury. The patients were divided into two groups:<br />

12 had isolated injuries, and 12 had multiple<br />

ligament injuries. The MCL injuries in both two<br />

groups were classified with M&D and Petermann<br />

systems. The evaluation of each system were<br />

compared with the AMA classification, and then<br />

with the surgical findings to assess the correlation<br />

between each of the classification systems and<br />

knee instability. We also compared the accuracy of<br />

prediction of the location of injury with the<br />

surgical findings to assess the accuracy of MRI<br />

detection of the injuries.<br />

Results: Neither MRI classification system<br />

correlated with AMA classification in either<br />

patient group. Only the Petermann classification<br />

correlated significantly with surgical findings, and<br />

only in the multiple injury group. Both<br />

classification systems were accurate for<br />

assessment of disruption of the femoral insertion<br />

in the isolated injury group, (sensitivity85.2%<br />

specificity 89.0%). Both classification systems<br />

were accurate for disruption of mid-substance in<br />

the multiple injury group, (sensitivity72.2%<br />

specificity83.3%).<br />

Conclusions: Our study showed that instability of<br />

the knee and the severity of MCL injury cannot be<br />

thoroughly assessed by the M&D or Petermann<br />

classification systems?but the predicted location<br />

of MCL injury corresponded with surgical findings.<br />

Both of the systems focus on partial or complete<br />

tears of the MCL irrespective of the site of injury.<br />

A future classification system that accurately<br />

predicts the location and the severity of MCL<br />

injury needs to be developed.<br />

E-poster w/ Standard #642<br />

Novel Technique for Ligament Fixation Using<br />

Bone Graft<br />

Tomonori Nagamine, Hiroshima, JAPAN,<br />

Presenter<br />

Mitsuo Ochi, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, JAPAN<br />

Nobuo Adachi, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, JAPAN<br />

Masataka Deie, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, JAPAN<br />

Yoshimasa Ishii, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, JAPAN<br />

Hiromi Kazusa, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, JAPAN<br />

Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, JAPAN<br />

(Purpose) The purposes of this study are to<br />

introduce our novel technique for ligament<br />

fixation using bone graft for the reconstruction of<br />

medial collateral ligament (MCL) or posterolateral<br />

structures (PLS) in the combined ligamentous<br />

injuries, and to evaluate the efficacy of this<br />

technique.<br />

(Materials and Methods) In this technique, a<br />

cylindrical bone plug (6.5mm in diameter, 15mm<br />

in length) is harvested at the anatomical femoral<br />

attachment of MCL or popliteal tendon using<br />

Mosaicplasty system. After placing the graft in the<br />

created bone socket, the bone plug is replaced<br />

over the graft. The graft is secured with a spike<br />

staple, after appropriate tension is applied to the<br />

graft. Six patients with the combined ligamentous<br />

injury underwent the MCL or PLS reconstruction<br />

using this technique. They were 4 males and 2<br />

females with the average age of 36.3 years (18 -<br />

60). We performed the MCL reconstruction in 3<br />

cases and the PLS reconstruction in 3 cases.<br />

Autologous gracilis tendons were used in 5 cases<br />

as a graft and allogeneic fascia lata in 1 case.<br />

(Results) We chronologically evaluated the<br />

functions of reconstructed ligament with MRI and<br />

stress radiography. Postoperatively, joint stability<br />

was excellent in all cases and the reconstructed<br />

ligaments were well demonstrated by MRI. There<br />

were no major complications during the operation<br />

and postoperatively.<br />

(Conclusion) This study clearly demonstrated the<br />

efficacy of our novel technique to fix the graft with<br />

bone block and staple in the reconstruction of<br />

MCL or PLS. This ligament fixation technique can<br />

provide rigid and less invasive fixation, because<br />

distance between the fixation sites can be shorter<br />

than that in the Endobutton technique.<br />

Comparing to the fixation with only staple without<br />

bone graft, bone graft may enhance the healing<br />

process of tendon to bone fixation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!