07.03.2014 Views

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

hundred and seventy patients who received ACL<br />

reconstruction from 1994 to 2001 were reviewed in<br />

a retrospective manner. 72 underwent<br />

reconstructions with BPTB autograft, and 98 were<br />

treated with quadriceps tendon. Patients were<br />

followed for an average 45 months (range, 25-73<br />

months). Each group was evaluated in terms of<br />

anterior laxity test, Lysholm score, IKDC score,<br />

KT-2000 arthrometer and isokinetic quadriceps<br />

strength using Cybex II dynamometer. Results : A<br />

mean age at operation, interval between injury<br />

and operation, and concomitant injury pattern<br />

was not different between the two groups. The two<br />

treatment methods produced similar outcomes in<br />

terms of patient satisfaction, activity level, range<br />

of motion and knee function (Lysholm score<br />

improved from 71 to 93 in BPTB group and from<br />

70 to 92 in quadriceps tendon group). Sixty-nine<br />

and Ninety-three patients were found to be grade<br />

0 or 1 in Lachman test and pivot shift,<br />

respectively. At follow-up, no statistical difference<br />

was found between groups in side to side<br />

difference evaluated by KT 2000 arthrometer.<br />

Quadriceps muscle strengths measured by Cybex<br />

II recovered to 82 % of contralateral side at 1 year<br />

and 89% at 2 years in quadriceps tendon group,<br />

and 76%, 80% in BPTB group. Conclusion : ACL<br />

reconstruction using quadriceps tendon showed<br />

similar satisfactory results when compared with<br />

that using BPTB. quadriceps tendon could be an<br />

good alternative graft choice.<br />

E-poster w/ Standard #437<br />

Anatomical Description of the Anterior Cruciate<br />

Ligament Attachment with Respect to the<br />

Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles. Part<br />

1: Tibial Footprint<br />

Andrew Edwards, London, UNITED KINGDOM,<br />

Presenter<br />

Andrew A Amis, London, UNITED KINGDOM<br />

Anthony MJ Bull, London, UNITED KINGDOM<br />

Imperial College, London, UNITED KINGDOM<br />

We present the anatomical attachments of the<br />

anterior cruciate ligament anteromedial and<br />

posterolateral bundles with the aim of relating the<br />

findings to consistent bony landmarks. 55<br />

specimens were used and the anterior cruciate<br />

ligament attachments were measured in relation<br />

to the various bony landmarks described. Wide<br />

variation in measured values was found when<br />

using the posterior tibial surface, the anterior<br />

tibial surface and the medial tibial spine as<br />

reference points. We found that the least variation<br />

in measured values occurred between the overthe-back<br />

position of the tibial plateau and the<br />

posterior limit of the anterior cruciate ligament<br />

footprint (distance 5.8mm, SD +/- 0.53mm, range<br />

4.8 - 6.9 mm). The over-the-back landmark also<br />

revealed the least variation in values with respect<br />

to the centre of the bundles. We describe the<br />

measured distances between the bony landmarks<br />

and the centre of two 6mm circles place in the<br />

posterior and medial limits of the bundles to<br />

represent the position of the drill holes in a<br />

double tunnel tibial technique for anterior<br />

cruciate reconstruction. The anteroposterior depth<br />

and the mediolateral width of the tibial plateau<br />

did not correlate well with the measurements<br />

taken from any of the bony landmarks with the<br />

exception of the posterior tibial surface distance<br />

to the posterior limit of the ACL. However this<br />

measurement showed a larger standard deviation<br />

and range than measurements taken from the<br />

over-the-back position.<br />

E-poster #438<br />

Press Fit ACL Reconstruction: Is It Reliable? A<br />

Prospective Randomized Study.<br />

Mohammad Razi, Tehran, IRAN, Presenter<br />

Aub Naderi, Tehran, Tehran IRAN<br />

Rasoul University Hospital, Tehran, IRAN<br />

Introduction: Sporadic reports indicate that Press<br />

Fit fixation of the BPTB graft in the femoral tunnel<br />

is reliable and has advantages of no need to use<br />

any hardware for fixation and preserving of the<br />

femoral bone stock in the case of revision, but<br />

there is no report to document the position and<br />

stability of the graft in the femoral tunnel. In this<br />

prospective randomized study, by incorporating a<br />

metal marker in the bony part of the patellar<br />

tendon graft, we documented its position and<br />

stability by control X- rays.<br />

Methods: Press Fit fixation of the graft in the<br />

femoral tunnel, was attempted in 35 males with<br />

the average age of 25 years, a metal marker was<br />

inserted in the bony part of the patellar tendon<br />

graft, Press Fitted in the femoral tunnel and its<br />

stability was tested by 200N traction in almost<br />

knee extension. In seven cases stability was not<br />

enough to withstand, therefore fixation was<br />

completed by interference screws. Also 3 patients<br />

lost from final evaluation. So 25 cases were<br />

followed for the average of 41 months (24 to 66<br />

mos). Patients were evaluated by serial X- rays,<br />

Functional tests, KT - 1000 arthrometer, Lysholm<br />

score, Tegner activity level, and IKDC.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!